Discourse analysis from an international relations perspective: the case study of Tucker Carlson’s televised interview with Vladimir Putin

Objective: This research examines Putin’s discourse in the Tucker Carlson interview of 6 February 2024 through the lens of international relations theories. The objective is to identify the main topics, themes and arguments put forward by the Russian president in a political discourse within the context of a war. Methodology: This study outlines the main premises, postulates, and theoretical contributions of prominent American international relations authors, with an emphasis on realism and liberal movements. Exploratory, descriptive and qualitative research methods were employed, based on content and thematic analysis, as part of the discourse analysis. The main themes, statements and keywords of the narrative are identified and systematically compared with the explanations and interpretations of the Ukraine war according to leading theorists. Results: The findings corroborate prior research that indicates a realist ideological substrate in Putin’s discourse. Nevertheless, arguments and premises based on neoliberal theory are also found, as well as the undeniable protagonism of historical and cultural factors in his arguments, suggesting the relevance of history with a nationalist perspective in his narrative. Limitations: Further research may elucidate the significance of nationalism and historical arguments in Putin’s discourse, as well as the notion of the Russian world. In this regard, analysing his discourse according to Russian theorists may offer new insights. Contribution: This research contributes to establishing a methodological framework for the study of political discourse in the context of a war conflict. Furthermore, this research facilitates a more comprehensive analysis of Putin’s discourses in other contexts, as well as a comparison of his narrative with other key messages of Russian propaganda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
aDResearch ESIC International Journal of Communication Research
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7263/adresic-32-285
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Political and Economic Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discourse analysis from an international relations perspective: the case study of Tucker Carlson’s televised interview with Vladimir Putin

Belén Puebla Martínez, Pablo Hidalgo-Cobo, Casandra López-Marcos
1 citations
aDResearch ESIC International Journal of Communication Research
Global Political and Economic Relations
2.23
article

Discourse analysis from an international relations perspective: the case study of Tucker Carlson’s televised interview with Vladimir Putin

Belén Puebla Martínez, Pablo Hidalgo-Cobo, Casandra López-Marcos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: This research examines Putin’s discourse in the Tucker Carlson interview of 6 February 2024 through the lens of international relations theories. The objective is to identify the main topics, themes and arguments put forward by the Russian president in a political discourse within the context of a war. Methodology: This study outlines the main premises, postulates, and theoretical contributions of prominent American international relations authors, with an emphasis on realism and liberal movements. Exploratory, descriptive and qualitative research methods were employed, based on content and thematic analysis, as part of the discourse analysis. The main themes, statements and keywords of the narrative are identified and systematically compared with the explanations and interpretations of the Ukraine war according to leading theorists. Results: The findings corroborate prior research that indicates a realist ideological substrate in Putin’s discourse. Nevertheless, arguments and premises based on neoliberal theory are also found, as well as the undeniable protagonism of historical and cultural factors in his arguments, suggesting the relevance of history with a nationalist perspective in his narrative. Limitations: Further research may elucidate the significance of nationalism and historical arguments in Putin’s discourse, as well as the notion of the Russian world. In this regard, analysing his discourse according to Russian theorists may offer new insights. Contribution: This research contributes to establishing a methodological framework for the study of political discourse in the context of a war conflict. Furthermore, this research facilitates a more comprehensive analysis of Putin’s discourses in other contexts, as well as a comparison of his narrative with other key messages of Russian propaganda.

aDResearch ESIC International Journal of Communication ResearchVol. 32
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global Political and Economic Relations
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.