Risk assessment of pesticide residues ingestion in food offered by institutional restaurant menus

The chronic ingestion of pesticide residues through food appears to be a global public health issue, especially in Brazil. This study evaluates 120 menus across six Brazilian institutional restaurants, estimating the allowance of active pesticide ingredients, residue characterization, and chronic exposure risk through food. Data analysis reveals 263 authorized active ingredients, predominantly insecticides (43%), fungicides (40%), and herbicides (14%) for use in 40 foods. Notably, 4% of residues are extremely toxic, 5% highly toxic, and 14% moderately toxic. Forty-two compounds, especially those permitted in animal-source foods, exhibit high bioaccumulation potential. Some foods harbor multiple pesticide residues, raising concerns, despite 99% of residues falling within the Acceptable Daily Intake. Methomyl insecticide poses potential ingestion risks during lunch, warranting attention. The pervasive presence of pesticide residues in daily consumed foods underscores the necessity for greater attention to the source of the food, ensuring access to healthy and safe collective consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313836
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk assessment of pesticide residues ingestion in food offered by institutional restaurant menus

Priscilla Moura Rolim, Larissa Mont’Alverne Jucá Seabra, Vanessa Pires, Thuany Matias da Silva et al.
4 citations
PLoS ONE
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
2.40
article

Risk assessment of pesticide residues ingestion in food offered by institutional restaurant menus

Priscilla Moura Rolim, Larissa Mont’Alverne Jucá Seabra, Vanessa Pires, Thuany Matias da Silva, Luciléia Granhen Tavares Colares, Barbara Lettyccya Pereira Chacon de Araújo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The chronic ingestion of pesticide residues through food appears to be a global public health issue, especially in Brazil. This study evaluates 120 menus across six Brazilian institutional restaurants, estimating the allowance of active pesticide ingredients, residue characterization, and chronic exposure risk through food. Data analysis reveals 263 authorized active ingredients, predominantly insecticides (43%), fungicides (40%), and herbicides (14%) for use in 40 foods. Notably, 4% of residues are extremely toxic, 5% highly toxic, and 14% moderately toxic. Forty-two compounds, especially those permitted in animal-source foods, exhibit high bioaccumulation potential. Some foods harbor multiple pesticide residues, raising concerns, despite 99% of residues falling within the Acceptable Daily Intake. Methomyl insecticide poses potential ingestion risks during lunch, warranting attention. The pervasive presence of pesticide residues in daily consumed foods underscores the necessity for greater attention to the source of the food, ensuring access to healthy and safe collective consumption.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(12)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Risk assessment of pesticide residues ingestion in food offered by institutional restaurant menus — Priscilla Moura Rolim, Larissa Mont’Alverne Jucá Seabra, et al. · PLoS ONE (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS