Effects of a Multimodal Pain Control Protocol Using 2% Lidocaine Intradermal and Meloxicam Intramuscular on Mitigating Behavioral Castration Pain in Piglets Using a Needleless System
Mitigating piglet castration pain is critical to minimize negative experiences and contribute to a positive affective state. A multimodal pain control protocol (needleless 2% lidocaine intradermal/0.4 mg/kg meloxicam intramuscular) was evaluated. Males were administered one of four treatments: (1) needleless lidocaine/meloxicam intramuscular (LM), (2) needleless lidocaine/saline intramuscular (LS), (3) needleless saline/meloxicam intramuscular (SM), and (4) needleless saline/saline intramuscular (SS). Females were sham castrated (SH). Piglets were recorded 24h pre-castration (M1) and 15min (M2), 3h (M3), and 24h post-castration (M4). The Unesp-Botucatu Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) was used to assess pain behavior. From a treatment standpoint, scores did not differ at M1 (<i>P</i> = 1.00) or M4 (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.36). However, at M2, LS piglets had (<i>P</i> < 0.01) higher scores (3.4) than LM piglets (1.6) and SH piglets had (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) the lowest scores (0.02). From a timepoint standpoint, piglets in the LS, LM, SM, and SS groups had (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05) higher scores at M2 compared with their baseline scores at M1. These results indicate that needleless lidocaine and intramuscular meloxicam offered no analgesic benefit.
Authors
- Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6005-5666)
- Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8522-5553)
- Victória R. Merenda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4745-9762)
- G.W. STEPHEN
- Erin Elizabeth King-Podzaline
- Alexandria Bokhart
Institutions
- Tufts University (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
- Published
- 2024-12-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2024.2440894
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.64