MERS-CoV spike vaccine-induced N-terminal domain-specific antibodies are more protective than receptor binding domain-specific antibodies

The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need to prepare for future emerging coronavriuses (CoVs) by understanding the principles behind effective CoV vaccine design such as protective immunity and antibody responses. To study which epitopes and subdomains contribute to <i>in vivo</i> protection, we utilized the prefusion-stabilized spike protein of MERS-CoV, MERS S-2P, as a vaccine immunogen. Vaccination with MERS S-2P elicited both receptor-binding domain (RBD)- and non-RBD-specific antibodies, including N-terminal domain (NTD)-specific G2-and CDC2-A2-like antibodies. Intriguingly, the immunogen MERS S-2P_ΔRBD, MERS S-2P with the RBDs removed, protects comparably to S1 and S-2P immunogens against MERS-CoV challenge. Moreover, passive transfer studies of polyclonal IgG from MERS S-2P immunized mice depleted of subdomain-specific antibodies demonstrated that non-RBD antibodies protected more than non-NTD antibodies. Altogether, these findings illustrate that <i>in-vivo</i> protection is not solely driven by RBD-specific antibodies and highlights the importance of targeting non-RBD sites in future CoV vaccine designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111632
Citations
4
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MERS-CoV spike vaccine-induced N-terminal domain-specific antibodies are more protective than receptor binding domain-specific antibodies

Andrew C. Ward, Jason S. McLellan, Anne P. Werner, Cynthia T. Ziwawo et al.
4 citations
iScience
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.56
article

MERS-CoV spike vaccine-induced N-terminal domain-specific antibodies are more protective than receptor binding domain-specific antibodies

Andrew C. Ward, Jason S. McLellan, Anne P. Werner, Cynthia T. Ziwawo, Adam S. Cockrell, Ralph Steven Baric, Osnat Rosen, Barney S. Graham, Kizzmekia S. Corbett, Rachel L. Graham, Sandhya Bangaru, Azad Kumar, Wing‐Pui Kong, Joseph Jeswin, Kaitlyn M. Morabito, Sarah R. Leist, Masaru Kanekiyo, Laura J. Stevens, Jacob Kocher, Olubukola M. Abiona, Yaroslav Tsybovsky, Nianshuang Wang, Wei Shi, Charis Palandjian, James D. Chappell, Lingshu Wang, Helen Matthews, Mark R. Denison, John R. Mascola, Alexandra Schäfer, Christian K O Dzuvor, Connor Eastman, Yi Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need to prepare for future emerging coronavriuses (CoVs) by understanding the principles behind effective CoV vaccine design such as protective immunity and antibody responses. To study which epitopes and subdomains contribute to <i>in vivo</i> protection, we utilized the prefusion-stabilized spike protein of MERS-CoV, MERS S-2P, as a vaccine immunogen. Vaccination with MERS S-2P elicited both receptor-binding domain (RBD)- and non-RBD-specific antibodies, including N-terminal domain (NTD)-specific G2-and CDC2-A2-like antibodies. Intriguingly, the immunogen MERS S-2P_ΔRBD, MERS S-2P with the RBDs removed, protects comparably to S1 and S-2P immunogens against MERS-CoV challenge. Moreover, passive transfer studies of polyclonal IgG from MERS S-2P immunized mice depleted of subdomain-specific antibodies demonstrated that non-RBD antibodies protected more than non-NTD antibodies. Altogether, these findings illustrate that <i>in-vivo</i> protection is not solely driven by RBD-specific antibodies and highlights the importance of targeting non-RBD sites in future CoV vaccine designs.

iScienceVol. 28(2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Scripps Research Institute (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US), Harvard University (US), Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Leidos, Vaccine Research Center, National Institutes of Health, NIH Office of the Director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.