New rights, new members? The consequences of intra-party primaries for membership

In response to declining membership, European parties have often moved to offering direct participation of members and/or non-members in leadership and candidate primaries. However, the consequences for party members remains unclear. This paper aims to address this issue by suggesting a new conceptual framework exploring the combined effect of the degree of inclusiveness of the two key formal dimensions of “who can run” and “who can vote” in intra-party primaries and their joint positive or negative effect on party membership size, attitude toward the leadership and turnout during the primary. Based on secondary and new pre- and post-primary party membership surveys data and in-depth membership interviews, the paper qualitatively and comparatively studies primaries within the UK Conservatives, the German Greens and the French Parti Socialiste. It finds that mainly primaries limited to members combined with permissive candidate requirements have potentially positive consequences for parties, attracting citizens back to parties, leading to higher participation and membership satisfaction. Thus, the paper contributes to the understanding of the consequences of party reforms for parties and party members.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Party Politics
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688241306728
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New rights, new members? The consequences of intra-party primaries for membership

Felix‐Christopher von Nostitz
2 citations
Party Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
4.46
article

New rights, new members? The consequences of intra-party primaries for membership

Felix‐Christopher von Nostitz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In response to declining membership, European parties have often moved to offering direct participation of members and/or non-members in leadership and candidate primaries. However, the consequences for party members remains unclear. This paper aims to address this issue by suggesting a new conceptual framework exploring the combined effect of the degree of inclusiveness of the two key formal dimensions of “who can run” and “who can vote” in intra-party primaries and their joint positive or negative effect on party membership size, attitude toward the leadership and turnout during the primary. Based on secondary and new pre- and post-primary party membership surveys data and in-depth membership interviews, the paper qualitatively and comparatively studies primaries within the UK Conservatives, the German Greens and the French Parti Socialiste. It finds that mainly primaries limited to members combined with permissive candidate requirements have potentially positive consequences for parties, attracting citizens back to parties, leading to higher participation and membership satisfaction. Thus, the paper contributes to the understanding of the consequences of party reforms for parties and party members.

Party PoliticsVol. 31(2)
Université Catholique de Lille (FR), Groupe Hospitalier de l'Institut Catholique de Lille (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

New rights, new members? The consequences of intra-party primaries for membership — Felix‐Christopher von Nostitz · Party Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS