Implementation of an Asymmetric Internal Field in the Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere (CIMI) Model

Abstract A Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere (CIMI) model has been developed to study the dynamics of the cold plasmasphere and the energetic plasmas in the inner magnetosphere, as well as their couplings with each other and with the ionosphere. The CIMI model is able to predict the cold plasma density and energetic electron and ion fluxes in geospace. Furthermore, CIMI is capable of predicting the Region 2 currents, penetration electric field, electron and ion precipitation and magnetospheric heat flux into the ionosphere. The CIMI model includes a realistic magnetic field configuration with a combination of an internal field and an external field imposed by the interaction of the solar wind with the magnetosphere. The internal field has previously been assumed to be a dipole. Recently, the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) has been implemented. This new capability enables studies of north‐south and longitudinal dependences in particle precipitation and heat flux, as well as the corresponding asymmetries in ionospheric and thermospheric responses. In this paper, we will briefly review the CIMI equations and model output. Then we will describe the new implementation of the IGRF model into CIMI and how to estimate the north‐south asymmetry in precipitating fluxes from the differences in field strength between magnetic conjugate points. The inclusion of a realistic internal field leads CIMI into a better position to couple with sophisticated ionosphere‐thermosphere models, most of which are using the IGRF model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja033075
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of an Asymmetric Internal Field in the Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere (CIMI) Model

Qianli Ma, S. B. Kang, N. Buzulukova, Mei‐Ching Fok et al.
7 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
2.32
article

Implementation of an Asymmetric Internal Field in the Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere (CIMI) Model

Qianli Ma, S. B. Kang, N. Buzulukova, Mei‐Ching Fok, R. A. Wolf, D. T. Welling, C. Ferradas, A. Glocer
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract A Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere (CIMI) model has been developed to study the dynamics of the cold plasmasphere and the energetic plasmas in the inner magnetosphere, as well as their couplings with each other and with the ionosphere. The CIMI model is able to predict the cold plasma density and energetic electron and ion fluxes in geospace. Furthermore, CIMI is capable of predicting the Region 2 currents, penetration electric field, electron and ion precipitation and magnetospheric heat flux into the ionosphere. The CIMI model includes a realistic magnetic field configuration with a combination of an internal field and an external field imposed by the interaction of the solar wind with the magnetosphere. The internal field has previously been assumed to be a dipole. Recently, the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) has been implemented. This new capability enables studies of north‐south and longitudinal dependences in particle precipitation and heat flux, as well as the corresponding asymmetries in ionospheric and thermospheric responses. In this paper, we will briefly review the CIMI equations and model output. Then we will describe the new implementation of the IGRF model into CIMI and how to estimate the north‐south asymmetry in precipitating fluxes from the differences in field strength between magnetic conjugate points. The inclusion of a realistic internal field leads CIMI into a better position to couple with sophisticated ionosphere‐thermosphere models, most of which are using the IGRF model.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 129(12)
Boston University (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of America (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Rice University (US), Catholic University of America (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Heliophysics Division
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.