Group Decision Making in Multiobjective Optimization: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract Group decision making has been studied from several viewpoints and a variety of methods has been proposed. However, in the literature on solving multiobjective optimization problems, the main focus has been on supporting a single decision maker. We conducted a systematic literature review to examine and synthesize the state-of-the-art of multiobjective optimization methods developed for group decision making. We analyze group decision making methods of multiobjective optimization according to how preferences of several decision makers are incorporated into the solution process, how to select the most preferred solution for the group, different types of decision makers, types of groups and how the group is to operate during the solution process. In addition, we identify the key issues in the literature that are required to be considered in further method development to increase the methods’ applicability in solving real-world problems. Finally, we guide how to select a method for solving real-world multiobjective optimization problems with multiple decision makers and suggest future research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Decision and Negotiation
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-024-09915-8
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Group Decision Making in Multiobjective Optimization: A Systematic Literature Review

Kaisa Miettinen, Johanna Silvennoinen, Juuso Pajasmaa
5 citations
Group Decision and Negotiation
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
1.81
article

Group Decision Making in Multiobjective Optimization: A Systematic Literature Review

Kaisa Miettinen, Johanna Silvennoinen, Juuso Pajasmaa
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Group decision making has been studied from several viewpoints and a variety of methods has been proposed. However, in the literature on solving multiobjective optimization problems, the main focus has been on supporting a single decision maker. We conducted a systematic literature review to examine and synthesize the state-of-the-art of multiobjective optimization methods developed for group decision making. We analyze group decision making methods of multiobjective optimization according to how preferences of several decision makers are incorporated into the solution process, how to select the most preferred solution for the group, different types of decision makers, types of groups and how the group is to operate during the solution process. In addition, we identify the key issues in the literature that are required to be considered in further method development to increase the methods’ applicability in solving real-world problems. Finally, we guide how to select a method for solving real-world multiobjective optimization problems with multiple decision makers and suggest future research directions.

Group Decision and NegotiationVol. 34(2)
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
European Commission, Academy of Finland, Jyväskylän Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
1.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.