Large-scale land acquisition and state (re) making in Ethiopia since the mid-2000s

This article explores how Ethiopia's historical state-building process unfolded in the context of large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) and the federal power structure in the post-2008 period. It aims to examine how federal government elites exerted control in Ethiopia's peripheral regions through mechanisms such as Development Agents, military apparatus, self-criticism sessions, and developmental state narratives, all within the broader neoliberal framework of agricultural land investment. Drawing on a blend of primary and secondary data, the study highlights how de facto centralized land governance emerged and how federal elites established institutional structures that curtailed the authority of regional elites. Consequently, while recent LSLAs in Ethiopia have served as tools for wealth accumulation and the promotion of ‘democratic centralism,’ the current regime has restructured local actors’ power and intensified oversight of investment activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development Studies Research
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2024.2441273
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large-scale land acquisition and state (re) making in Ethiopia since the mid-2000s

Wassihun Gebreegizaber Woldesenbet
1 citations
Development Studies Research
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
1.34
article

Large-scale land acquisition and state (re) making in Ethiopia since the mid-2000s

Wassihun Gebreegizaber Woldesenbet
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores how Ethiopia's historical state-building process unfolded in the context of large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) and the federal power structure in the post-2008 period. It aims to examine how federal government elites exerted control in Ethiopia's peripheral regions through mechanisms such as Development Agents, military apparatus, self-criticism sessions, and developmental state narratives, all within the broader neoliberal framework of agricultural land investment. Drawing on a blend of primary and secondary data, the study highlights how de facto centralized land governance emerged and how federal elites established institutional structures that curtailed the authority of regional elites. Consequently, while recent LSLAs in Ethiopia have served as tools for wealth accumulation and the promotion of ‘democratic centralism,’ the current regime has restructured local actors’ power and intensified oversight of investment activities.

Development Studies ResearchVol. 12(1)
University of Groningen (NL), Health Action International (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
1.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.