When common cognitive biases impact debriefing conversations

Healthcare debriefing is a cognitively demanding conversation after a simulation or clinical experience that promotes reflection, underpinned by psychological safety and attention to learner needs. The process of debriefing requires mental processing that engages both "fast" or unconscious thinking and "slow" intentional thinking to be able to navigate the conversation. "Fast" thinking has the potential to surface cognitive biases that impact reflection and may negatively influence debriefer behaviors, debriefing strategies, and debriefing foundations. As a result, negative cognitive biases risk undermining learning outcomes from debriefing conversations. As the use of healthcare simulation is expanding, the need for faculty development specific to the roles bias plays is imperative. In this article, we hope to build awareness about common cognitive biases that may present in debriefing conversations so debriefers have the chance to begin the hard work of identifying and attending to their potential detrimental impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Simulation
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00324-0
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When common cognitive biases impact debriefing conversations

Dana George Trottier, Kellie Bryant, Suzanne Bentley, Adam Cheng et al.
4 citations
Advances in Simulation
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
1.31
article

When common cognitive biases impact debriefing conversations

Dana George Trottier, Kellie Bryant, Suzanne Bentley, Adam Cheng, Kimberly Campbell-Taylor, Michaela Kolbe, Michael Meguerdichian, Vincent Grant
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Healthcare debriefing is a cognitively demanding conversation after a simulation or clinical experience that promotes reflection, underpinned by psychological safety and attention to learner needs. The process of debriefing requires mental processing that engages both "fast" or unconscious thinking and "slow" intentional thinking to be able to navigate the conversation. "Fast" thinking has the potential to surface cognitive biases that impact reflection and may negatively influence debriefer behaviors, debriefing strategies, and debriefing foundations. As a result, negative cognitive biases risk undermining learning outcomes from debriefing conversations. As the use of healthcare simulation is expanding, the need for faculty development specific to the roles bias plays is imperative. In this article, we hope to build awareness about common cognitive biases that may present in debriefing conversations so debriefers have the chance to begin the hard work of identifying and attending to their potential detrimental impacts.

Advances in SimulationVol. 9(1)
Alberta Health Services (CA), New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (US), Fordham University (US), University of Calgary (CA), National League for Nursing (US), Harlem Hospital Center (US), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Elmhurst Hospital Center (US), Alberta Health (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When common cognitive biases impact debriefing conversations — Dana George Trottier, Kellie Bryant, et al. · Advances in Simulation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS