The effect of novel mosquito bite prevention tools on Anopheles minimus landing and key secondary endpoints: semi-field evaluations in Thailand

This SFS evaluation indicates an effect of these VPSR and ITC interventions in reducing An. minimus landing for the user, and indicates their potential for community protection by secondary modes of action. This study demonstrates the utility of SFS trials in the evaluation of bite prevention tools and emphasizes the need for multiple evaluations at different sites. It also highlights possible sources of biases observed, including the measuring of mosquito landing rather than biting, weather parameters, and low mosquito recapture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Malaria Journal
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-05188-3
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of novel mosquito bite prevention tools on Anopheles minimus landing and key secondary endpoints: semi-field evaluations in Thailand

Allison Tatarsky, Manop Saeung, Jeffrey Hii, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap et al.
10 citations
Malaria Journal
Malaria Research and Control
5.43
article

The effect of novel mosquito bite prevention tools on Anopheles minimus landing and key secondary endpoints: semi-field evaluations in Thailand

Allison Tatarsky, Manop Saeung, Jeffrey Hii, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap, Sarah Moore, Amanda Ross, Neil F. Lobo, Élodie A. Vajda, Michael B. MacDonald, David J. McIver, Alongkot Ponlawat, Nakul Chitnis, Jason H. Richardson, Arissara Pongsiri
article en
10 citations

Abstract

This SFS evaluation indicates an effect of these VPSR and ITC interventions in reducing An. minimus landing for the user, and indicates their potential for community protection by secondary modes of action. This study demonstrates the utility of SFS trials in the evaluation of bite prevention tools and emphasizes the need for multiple evaluations at different sites. It also highlights possible sources of biases observed, including the measuring of mosquito landing rather than biting, weather parameters, and low mosquito recapture.

Malaria JournalVol. 23(1)
University of Notre Dame (US), Ifakara Health Institute (TZ), Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Basel (CH), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB), Kasetsart University (TH), Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (TH), Innovative Vector Control Consortium (GB)
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government, Kasetsart University, Ministry of Defense, Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Malaria Research and Control
5.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.