Test–retest reliability and validity in lower limb proprioception tests using image capture technique in healthy adults

Abstract Background Proprioceptive assessments in clinical practice remain confined to ordinal scales, with a lack of ratio scales. Quantitative proprioception assessments such as threshold to detect passive motion (TDPM) and joint position sense (JPS) help determine the severity of functional impairments and evaluate treatment efficacy. However, their clinical introduction remains challenging due to the extensive and costly equipment required for their measurement. Purpose To investigate the test–retest reliability and validity in the simplified TDPM and JPS using 14 image capture techniques in targeting hip, knee, and ankle joints. Methods This study included 16 volunteers. The measurements were conducted in individual rehabilitation rooms located within the wards of our hospital. Examiners measured a total of 12 TDPM and JPS, including hip, knee, and ankle joints, each performed three times. Moreover, the multi-joint TDPM, distinguished into lower limb flexion and extension patterns, was additionally performed. These measurements were repeated 1 week later. In statistical analysis, the test–retest reliability and construct validity were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Results The TDPM, multi-joint TDPM, and JPS (variable data; VE) demonstrated moderate reliability across all tested movement directions (TDPM: ICC 0.52–0.70, limits of agreement [LOA] < 10°; multi-joint TDPM: ICC 0.64–0.73, LOA < 10°; JPS: ICC 0.55–0.78, LOA < 10°). No significant correlation was observed between these tests. Conclusions TDPM and JPS using image capture techniques can reliably measure proprioception and serve as independent tests to evaluate different aspects of proprioception. These findings contribute to future studies aimed at introducing quantitative proprioception tests into clinical practice and facilitating clinical decision-making for rehabilitation targeting proprioceptive impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43161-024-00225-3
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test–retest reliability and validity in lower limb proprioception tests using image capture technique in healthy adults

Hikaru Kawana, Aisuke Takahashi, Katsuhiro Furukawa
5 citations
Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.24
article

Test–retest reliability and validity in lower limb proprioception tests using image capture technique in healthy adults

Hikaru Kawana, Aisuke Takahashi, Katsuhiro Furukawa
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Proprioceptive assessments in clinical practice remain confined to ordinal scales, with a lack of ratio scales. Quantitative proprioception assessments such as threshold to detect passive motion (TDPM) and joint position sense (JPS) help determine the severity of functional impairments and evaluate treatment efficacy. However, their clinical introduction remains challenging due to the extensive and costly equipment required for their measurement. Purpose To investigate the test–retest reliability and validity in the simplified TDPM and JPS using 14 image capture techniques in targeting hip, knee, and ankle joints. Methods This study included 16 volunteers. The measurements were conducted in individual rehabilitation rooms located within the wards of our hospital. Examiners measured a total of 12 TDPM and JPS, including hip, knee, and ankle joints, each performed three times. Moreover, the multi-joint TDPM, distinguished into lower limb flexion and extension patterns, was additionally performed. These measurements were repeated 1 week later. In statistical analysis, the test–retest reliability and construct validity were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Results The TDPM, multi-joint TDPM, and JPS (variable data; VE) demonstrated moderate reliability across all tested movement directions (TDPM: ICC 0.52–0.70, limits of agreement [LOA] < 10°; multi-joint TDPM: ICC 0.64–0.73, LOA < 10°; JPS: ICC 0.55–0.78, LOA < 10°). No significant correlation was observed between these tests. Conclusions TDPM and JPS using image capture techniques can reliably measure proprioception and serve as independent tests to evaluate different aspects of proprioception. These findings contribute to future studies aimed at introducing quantitative proprioception tests into clinical practice and facilitating clinical decision-making for rehabilitation targeting proprioceptive impairment.

Bulletin of Faculty of Physical TherapyVol. 29(1)
Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital (JP), IRYO Sosei University (JP)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.