Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation: Comparison among Different Beamforming and Data Acquisition Methods

SummaryConventional B-mode ultrasound is widely used in clinical settings and can be supplemented by quantitative analysis of backscattered signals. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has seen growing interest in providing supplemental and quantitative insights into tissue characteristics and disease diagnostics. The accuracy of QUS, however, depends on the acquisition and format of the backscattered signals. This paper investigates the impact of several data acquisition techniques on QUS performance. The study demonstrates that unprocessed channel data, from plane wave imaging, delivers the most accurate Attenuation Coefficient Estimation (ACE) measurement, with an average error of about 5% for ACE across different independent experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/uffc-js60046.2024.10793949
Primary Topic
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation: Comparison among Different Beamforming and Data Acquisition Methods

Hamid Moradi, Robert Rohling, Farah Deeba
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
article

Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation: Comparison among Different Beamforming and Data Acquisition Methods

Hamid Moradi, Robert Rohling, Farah Deeba
article en

Abstract

SummaryConventional B-mode ultrasound is widely used in clinical settings and can be supplemented by quantitative analysis of backscattered signals. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has seen growing interest in providing supplemental and quantitative insights into tissue characteristics and disease diagnostics. The accuracy of QUS, however, depends on the acquisition and format of the backscattered signals. This paper investigates the impact of several data acquisition techniques on QUS performance. The study demonstrates that unprocessed channel data, from plane wave imaging, delivers the most accurate Attenuation Coefficient Estimation (ACE) measurement, with an average error of about 5% for ACE across different independent experiments.

University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.