Accuracy vs. Privacy: a Federated Learning Approach for Lung Ultrasound Pattern Classification

The exchange and flow of healthcare data are crucial and beneficial to develop automated methods for providing better care to patients. However, privacy is one of the major concerns when it comes to sharing medical data. Due to these concerns, limited data are available to develop such automated methods. To overcome this challenge, federated learning (FL), has gained significant interest within the research community as it allows to train deep learning (DL) models on different data sources without having to share data. In this study, our focus is on the evaluation of DL models trained to classify lung ultrasound (LUS) patterns in data acquired from multiple medical centers in FL setting. These patterns include horizontal artifacts, vertical artifacts, and small to large consolidations. To classify these patterns, we used ResNet-18 with spatial attention, trained and tested on 2104 LUS videos from 135 patients across 6 medical centers with a train-test split at the patient level. The classification performance of the patterns at frame and video levels is evaluated and the model’s capability to perform patients’ prognostic stratification is also assessed. We also compare it with an identical, centrally-trained model as the baseline method. Results show that the FL model achieved an overall accuracy of 57.5%, 48.6%, and 75% for frame, video, and prognostic levels, respectively, compared to 66.7%, 47.4%, and 80.8% achieved by the monolithic model. Despite a slight reduction in the classification performance compared to the monolithic model, FL demonstrates overall comparable results. These results underscore the efficacy of FL in enabling medical centers to learn collaboratively without the need to share raw data, thereby preserving privacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/uffc-js60046.2024.10793911
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy vs. Privacy: a Federated Learning Approach for Lung Ultrasound Pattern Classification

Giovanni Iacca, Elena Torri, Umair Khan, Francesco Tursi et al.
1 citations
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.40
article

Accuracy vs. Privacy: a Federated Learning Approach for Lung Ultrasound Pattern Classification

Giovanni Iacca, Elena Torri, Umair Khan, Francesco Tursi, Libertario Demi, Leonardo Lucio Custode, Tiziano Perrone, Andrea Smargiassi, Veronica Narvena, Riccardo Inchingolo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The exchange and flow of healthcare data are crucial and beneficial to develop automated methods for providing better care to patients. However, privacy is one of the major concerns when it comes to sharing medical data. Due to these concerns, limited data are available to develop such automated methods. To overcome this challenge, federated learning (FL), has gained significant interest within the research community as it allows to train deep learning (DL) models on different data sources without having to share data. In this study, our focus is on the evaluation of DL models trained to classify lung ultrasound (LUS) patterns in data acquired from multiple medical centers in FL setting. These patterns include horizontal artifacts, vertical artifacts, and small to large consolidations. To classify these patterns, we used ResNet-18 with spatial attention, trained and tested on 2104 LUS videos from 135 patients across 6 medical centers with a train-test split at the patient level. The classification performance of the patterns at frame and video levels is evaluated and the model’s capability to perform patients’ prognostic stratification is also assessed. We also compare it with an identical, centrally-trained model as the baseline method. Results show that the FL model achieved an overall accuracy of 57.5%, 48.6%, and 75% for frame, video, and prognostic levels, respectively, compared to 66.7%, 47.4%, and 80.8% achieved by the monolithic model. Despite a slight reduction in the classification performance compared to the monolithic model, FL demonstrates overall comparable results. These results underscore the efficacy of FL in enabling medical centers to learn collaboratively without the need to share raw data, thereby preserving privacy.

University of Trento (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Humanitas Gavazzeni (IT), Ospedale Maggiore di Lodi (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Lodi
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.