Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in clinical trials of mental health apps

Mental health apps are efficacious, yet they may pose risks in some. This review (CRD42024506486) examined adverse events (AEs) from mental health apps. We searched (May 2024) the Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases to identify clinical trials of mental health apps. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Only 55 of 171 identified clinical trials reported AEs. AEs were more likely to be reported in trials sampling schizophrenia and delivering apps with symptom monitoring technology. The meta-analytic deterioration rate from 13 app conditions was 6.7% (95% CI = 4.3, 10.1, I<sup>2</sup> = 75%). Deterioration rates did not differ between app and control groups (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.62-1.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Reporting of AEs was heterogeneous, in terms of assessments used, events recorded, and detail provided. Overall, few clinical trials of mental health apps report AEs. Those that do often provide insufficient information to properly judge risks related to app use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01388-y
Citations
32
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in clinical trials of mental health apps

Jake Linardon, Simon Benjamin Goldberg, Matthew Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, Zoe McClure et al.
32 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Digital Mental Health Interventions
13.12
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in clinical trials of mental health apps

Jake Linardon, Simon Benjamin Goldberg, Matthew Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, Zoe McClure, Cleo Anderson, Joseph Firth, John Blake Torous
article en
32 citations

Abstract

Mental health apps are efficacious, yet they may pose risks in some. This review (CRD42024506486) examined adverse events (AEs) from mental health apps. We searched (May 2024) the Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases to identify clinical trials of mental health apps. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Only 55 of 171 identified clinical trials reported AEs. AEs were more likely to be reported in trials sampling schizophrenia and delivering apps with symptom monitoring technology. The meta-analytic deterioration rate from 13 app conditions was 6.7% (95% CI = 4.3, 10.1, I<sup>2</sup> = 75%). Deterioration rates did not differ between app and control groups (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.62-1.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Reporting of AEs was heterogeneous, in terms of assessments used, events recorded, and detail provided. Overall, few clinical trials of mental health apps report AEs. Those that do often provide insufficient information to properly judge risks related to app use.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 7(1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Harvard University (US), Deakin University (AU), Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Wisconsin Health (US), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US)
Argosy Foundation, UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
13.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.