Non-tariff Measures in Services Sector: a PPML Analysis

The paper presents an analysis of the tariff equivalent (AVEs) of regulations in the services sector, employing sectoral-level estimates derived from the gravity equation. Our findings indicate that advancements in information and communication technology have diminished the significance of traditional factors such as geographical distance and historical ties. Furthermore, we observe a positive correlation between trade barriers in the services sector and a nation’s level of economic development, suggesting that adherence to regulations tends to increase with per capita income. Moreover, our analysis reveals heterogeneity in protectionism across different sectors, with an apparent indirect relationship with the developmental stage of a country. On average, the gas sector emerges as the most heavily protected sector, whereas the air transport sector is relatively more open. AVE values across all sectors, Luxembourg, Singapore, Belgium, and Ireland emerge as the most open economies, while Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Pakistan, and Tajikistan are the most restrictive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Economics
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2024.2432806
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-tariff Measures in Services Sector: a PPML Analysis

Bushra Faizi, Mohamed Eskandar Shah Mohd Rasid, Nasim Shah Shirazi
Journal of Applied Economics
Global trade and economics
article

Non-tariff Measures in Services Sector: a PPML Analysis

Bushra Faizi, Mohamed Eskandar Shah Mohd Rasid, Nasim Shah Shirazi
article en

Abstract

The paper presents an analysis of the tariff equivalent (AVEs) of regulations in the services sector, employing sectoral-level estimates derived from the gravity equation. Our findings indicate that advancements in information and communication technology have diminished the significance of traditional factors such as geographical distance and historical ties. Furthermore, we observe a positive correlation between trade barriers in the services sector and a nation’s level of economic development, suggesting that adherence to regulations tends to increase with per capita income. Moreover, our analysis reveals heterogeneity in protectionism across different sectors, with an apparent indirect relationship with the developmental stage of a country. On average, the gas sector emerges as the most heavily protected sector, whereas the air transport sector is relatively more open. AVE values across all sectors, Luxembourg, Singapore, Belgium, and Ireland emerge as the most open economies, while Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Pakistan, and Tajikistan are the most restrictive.

Journal of Applied EconomicsVol. 28(1)
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Qatar Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.