The political effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic in Weimar Germany

How did the 1918 Influenza pandemic affect elections in Weimar Germany? We combine a panel of election results (1893–1933) with spatial heterogeneity in excess flu mortality to assess the pandemic’s effect on voting behavior across constituencies. Applying a dynamic differences-in-differences approach, we find that areas with higher influenza mortality saw a lasting shift towards leftwing parties. We argue that pandemic intensity increased the salience of public health policy, prompting voters to reward parties signaling competence in health issues. Alternative explanations such as pandemic-induced economic hardship, punishment of incumbents, or political polarization are not supported by our findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Explorations in Economic History
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101648
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The political effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic in Weimar Germany

Christoph Koenig, Stefan Bauernschuster, Matthias Blum, Erik Hornung
3 citations
Explorations in Economic History
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
6.69
article

The political effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic in Weimar Germany

Christoph Koenig, Stefan Bauernschuster, Matthias Blum, Erik Hornung
article en
3 citations

Abstract

How did the 1918 Influenza pandemic affect elections in Weimar Germany? We combine a panel of election results (1893–1933) with spatial heterogeneity in excess flu mortality to assess the pandemic’s effect on voting behavior across constituencies. Applying a dynamic differences-in-differences approach, we find that areas with higher influenza mortality saw a lasting shift towards leftwing parties. We argue that pandemic intensity increased the salience of public health policy, prompting voters to reward parties signaling competence in health issues. Alternative explanations such as pandemic-induced economic hardship, punishment of incumbents, or political polarization are not supported by our findings.

Explorations in Economic HistoryVol. 96
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Queen's University Belfast (GB), Stranmillis University College (GB), University of Cologne (DE), University of Passau (DE), German Medical Association (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Economic and Social Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.