Comparison of Vendor-Pretrained and Custom-Trained Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Head-and-Neck, Breast, and Prostate Cancers

These findings underscore the substantial impact of institutional preferences and clinical practices on the implementation of vendor-pretrained models. We also found that a relatively small amount of institutional data was sufficient to train customized segmentation models with sufficient accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14242851
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Vendor-Pretrained and Custom-Trained Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Head-and-Neck, Breast, and Prostate Cancers

Jack Phan, Sanjay Shete, Fredrik Löfman, Mohammad D. El Basha et al.
1 citations
Diagnostics
AI in cancer detection
0.35
article

Comparison of Vendor-Pretrained and Custom-Trained Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Head-and-Neck, Breast, and Prostate Cancers

Jack Phan, Sanjay Shete, Fredrik Löfman, Mohammad D. El Basha, Xinru Chen, Hana Baroudi, Laurence E. Court, Yao Zhao, Chelain R. Goodman, Peter Balter, Skylar Gay, Jinzhong Yang, Joshua S. Niedzielski, Cenji Yu, Zhongxing Liao, He Wang, Xiaodong Zhang, Seungtaek Choi, Aji Daniel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

These findings underscore the substantial impact of institutional preferences and clinical practices on the implementation of vendor-pretrained models. We also found that a relatively small amount of institutional data was sufficient to train customized segmentation models with sufficient accuracy.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(24)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), RaySearch Laboratories (Sweden) (SE), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Radiation Oncology Institute, National Institutes of Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
AI in cancer detection
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Vendor-Pretrained and Custom-Trained Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Head-and-Neck, Breast, and Prostate Cancers — Jack Phan, Sanjay Shete, et al. · Diagnostics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS