Knowledge Extraction from LLMs for Scalable Historical Data Annotation

This paper introduces a novel approach to extract knowledge from large language models and generate structured historical datasets. We investigate the feasibility and limitations of this technique by comparing the generated data against two human-annotated historical datasets spanning from 10,000 BC to 2000 CE. Our findings demonstrate that generative AI can successfully produce historical annotations for a wide range of variables, including political, economic, and social factors. However, the model’s performance varies across different regions, influenced by factors such as data granularity, historical complexity, and model limitations. We highlight the importance of high-quality instructions and effective prompt engineering to mitigate issues like hallucinations and improve the accuracy of generated annotations. The successful application of this technique can significantly accelerate the development of reliable structured historical datasets, with a potentially high impact on comparative and computational history.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13244990
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge Extraction from LLMs for Scalable Historical Data Annotation

Fabio Celli, Dmitry Mingazov
4 citations
Electronics
Natural Language Processing Techniques
1.39
article

Knowledge Extraction from LLMs for Scalable Historical Data Annotation

Fabio Celli, Dmitry Mingazov
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel approach to extract knowledge from large language models and generate structured historical datasets. We investigate the feasibility and limitations of this technique by comparing the generated data against two human-annotated historical datasets spanning from 10,000 BC to 2000 CE. Our findings demonstrate that generative AI can successfully produce historical annotations for a wide range of variables, including political, economic, and social factors. However, the model’s performance varies across different regions, influenced by factors such as data granularity, historical complexity, and model limitations. We highlight the importance of high-quality instructions and effective prompt engineering to mitigate issues like hallucinations and improve the accuracy of generated annotations. The successful application of this technique can significantly accelerate the development of reliable structured historical datasets, with a potentially high impact on comparative and computational history.

ElectronicsVol. 13(24)
European Commission
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.