A comparative analysis of fault detection and process diagnosis methods based on a signal processing paradigm

An important paradigm in industrial engineering for fault detection and diagnosis purposes is signal processing. The various methods consider methods in the time, frequency, or time–frequency domain for signal processing as state and output signals from the considered process. The objective of this work is to perform a comparative analysis of the most used methods based on a signal processing paradigm and in the context of fault detection and process diagnosis. The electromechanical equipment that generates mechanical vibrations—as an effect of bearing faults—is considered and analyzed. The recorded data are explored with smaller and sliding frames, adapted to the processing criteria used. Seven methods are considered for evaluation: two in the time domain, two in the frequency domain and three in the time–frequency domain. The main problem is to extract and select the right features to use in the classification stage. The methods of the time domain are based on statistical moments and signal modeling. The methods in the frequency domain use either the discrete components of power spectra or the features of the frequency domain. In the time–frequency domain, the coefficients of the time–frequency transforms define digital images, which are further processed. For testing, the methods are evaluated with real recorded data from bearings with several types and sizes of faults, i.e., incipient, medium, advanced, and large. Finally, the considered methods are compared from the point of view of five criteria, namely, the recognition rate, window length, response time, computational resources, and complexity of the algorithms. A global quality criterion is built and used to assess the quality of the methods. The results of the computer-based experiments show acceptable performance for all methods for the test case of bearings but the potential to detect more complex faults and change detection in the behavior of the machines, in general. Time–frequency methods offer an optimum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06390-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of fault detection and process diagnosis methods based on a signal processing paradigm

Dorel Aiordăchioaie
2 citations
Discover Applied Sciences
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
0.66
article

A comparative analysis of fault detection and process diagnosis methods based on a signal processing paradigm

Dorel Aiordăchioaie
article en
2 citations

Abstract

An important paradigm in industrial engineering for fault detection and diagnosis purposes is signal processing. The various methods consider methods in the time, frequency, or time–frequency domain for signal processing as state and output signals from the considered process. The objective of this work is to perform a comparative analysis of the most used methods based on a signal processing paradigm and in the context of fault detection and process diagnosis. The electromechanical equipment that generates mechanical vibrations—as an effect of bearing faults—is considered and analyzed. The recorded data are explored with smaller and sliding frames, adapted to the processing criteria used. Seven methods are considered for evaluation: two in the time domain, two in the frequency domain and three in the time–frequency domain. The main problem is to extract and select the right features to use in the classification stage. The methods of the time domain are based on statistical moments and signal modeling. The methods in the frequency domain use either the discrete components of power spectra or the features of the frequency domain. In the time–frequency domain, the coefficients of the time–frequency transforms define digital images, which are further processed. For testing, the methods are evaluated with real recorded data from bearings with several types and sizes of faults, i.e., incipient, medium, advanced, and large. Finally, the considered methods are compared from the point of view of five criteria, namely, the recognition rate, window length, response time, computational resources, and complexity of the algorithms. A global quality criterion is built and used to assess the quality of the methods. The results of the computer-based experiments show acceptable performance for all methods for the test case of bearings but the potential to detect more complex faults and change detection in the behavior of the machines, in general. Time–frequency methods offer an optimum.

Discover Applied SciencesVol. 7(1)
"Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati (RO)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.