Electrochemical and Molecular Docking Studies on DNA, HSA and BSA Bindings and In Silico Physicochemical Properties of (E)-1-((2,4-dichlorophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol and (E)-1-((2-chloro-4-nitrophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol

The binding interactions of (E)-1-((2,4-dichlorophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol (DCPIMN) and (E)-1-((2-chloro-4-nitrophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol (CNPIMN) with some biomolecules, namely, calf thymus DNA (ct-DNA) and serum albumins (HSA and BSA) were investigated by square-wave voltammetry (SWV) at physiological pH of 7.40. Also, the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) profiles of DCPIMN and CNPIMN were reported. DCPIMN had an irreversible voltammetric peak at −1.352 V on the mercury electrode at pH 7.40. However, in physiological pH, electrochemical experiments revealed that CNPIMN showed two irreversible cathodic peaks owing to reductions of nitro and azomethine moieties, respectively. The variations in the current and potential values of reduction signals of DCPIMN and CNPIMN with adding of different concentrations of these biomolecules (BMs) were followed. The voltammetric experiments showed that although DCPIMN interacted with these BMs, CNPIMN only interacted with HSA. The binding constants (K) of these 1 : 1 interactions were calculated from electrochemical data. These K values showed that the binding strength of BSA to DCPIMN is stronger than those of HSA and ct-DNA compounds. Moreover, CNPIMN binds more strongly to HSA than DCPIMN. On the other hand, the molecular docking studies of DCPIMN and CNPIMN were carried out to evaluate their theoretical binding affinities. The binding affinity (BA) of BSA (–8.9 kcal/mol) with DCPIMN is higher than those of A-DNA, B-DNA and HSA. In addition, the BA value of HSA with CNPIMN is also greater than that of its interaction with DCPIMN. From the molecular docking results, it was found that there was a hydrogen bond between −NO2 group of CNPIMN and ARG117 residue of HSA. Finally, pharmacokinetic properties of these Schiff bases exhibited that DCPIMN has the capability of blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration; however, CNPIMN does not have this feature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Electrochemistry
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1023193524700484
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metal complexes synthesis and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrochemical and Molecular Docking Studies on DNA, HSA and BSA Bindings and In Silico Physicochemical Properties of (E)-1-((2,4-dichlorophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol and (E)-1-((2-chloro-4-nitrophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol

Ender Biçer, Mustafa Macit, Neslihan Özdemir
1 citations
Russian Journal of Electrochemistry
Metal complexes synthesis and properties
0.28
article

Electrochemical and Molecular Docking Studies on DNA, HSA and BSA Bindings and In Silico Physicochemical Properties of (E)-1-((2,4-dichlorophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol and (E)-1-((2-chloro-4-nitrophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol

Ender Biçer, Mustafa Macit, Neslihan Özdemir
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The binding interactions of (E)-1-((2,4-dichlorophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol (DCPIMN) and (E)-1-((2-chloro-4-nitrophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol (CNPIMN) with some biomolecules, namely, calf thymus DNA (ct-DNA) and serum albumins (HSA and BSA) were investigated by square-wave voltammetry (SWV) at physiological pH of 7.40. Also, the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) profiles of DCPIMN and CNPIMN were reported. DCPIMN had an irreversible voltammetric peak at −1.352 V on the mercury electrode at pH 7.40. However, in physiological pH, electrochemical experiments revealed that CNPIMN showed two irreversible cathodic peaks owing to reductions of nitro and azomethine moieties, respectively. The variations in the current and potential values of reduction signals of DCPIMN and CNPIMN with adding of different concentrations of these biomolecules (BMs) were followed. The voltammetric experiments showed that although DCPIMN interacted with these BMs, CNPIMN only interacted with HSA. The binding constants (K) of these 1 : 1 interactions were calculated from electrochemical data. These K values showed that the binding strength of BSA to DCPIMN is stronger than those of HSA and ct-DNA compounds. Moreover, CNPIMN binds more strongly to HSA than DCPIMN. On the other hand, the molecular docking studies of DCPIMN and CNPIMN were carried out to evaluate their theoretical binding affinities. The binding affinity (BA) of BSA (–8.9 kcal/mol) with DCPIMN is higher than those of A-DNA, B-DNA and HSA. In addition, the BA value of HSA with CNPIMN is also greater than that of its interaction with DCPIMN. From the molecular docking results, it was found that there was a hydrogen bond between −NO2 group of CNPIMN and ARG117 residue of HSA. Finally, pharmacokinetic properties of these Schiff bases exhibited that DCPIMN has the capability of blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration; however, CNPIMN does not have this feature.

Russian Journal of ElectrochemistryVol. 60(11)
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Amasya Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Metal complexes synthesis and properties
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.