N‐Factorial Scenarios: A Systems‐Theoretical Approach to Scenario‐Planning

ABSTRACT Scenarios are among the most popular techniques for managing the uncertainty and complexity of the future. Even the more sophisticated scenario designs, however, often reduce the future to a narrow set of typically only two key factors that are arranged into a four‐square matrix representing four distinct yet interrelated scenarios. Consequently, scenarios have been criticised for being simplistic or reductionist by design. In this article, we address these criticisms by proposing a basic design for n‐factorial scenarios. Following a short discussion of the procedures and limitations of classical scenario design, we draw on the example of a standard 2 × 2 matrix titled ‘Four Scenarios for the Digital Transformation’ to illustrate the limitations of the standard approach and demonstrate the potential of a digital approach to scenario building. We conclude that standard scenario planning is often characterised by a systematic omission of potentially critical scenarios, which our proposed digital approach can detect and map out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3120
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

N‐Factorial Scenarios: A Systems‐Theoretical Approach to Scenario‐Planning

Jari Kaivo‐oja, Steffen Roth, Austė Kiškienė, Dovilė Gaižauskienė
5 citations
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.45
article

N‐Factorial Scenarios: A Systems‐Theoretical Approach to Scenario‐Planning

Jari Kaivo‐oja, Steffen Roth, Austė Kiškienė, Dovilė Gaižauskienė
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Scenarios are among the most popular techniques for managing the uncertainty and complexity of the future. Even the more sophisticated scenario designs, however, often reduce the future to a narrow set of typically only two key factors that are arranged into a four‐square matrix representing four distinct yet interrelated scenarios. Consequently, scenarios have been criticised for being simplistic or reductionist by design. In this article, we address these criticisms by proposing a basic design for n‐factorial scenarios. Following a short discussion of the procedures and limitations of classical scenario design, we draw on the example of a standard 2 × 2 matrix titled ‘Four Scenarios for the Digital Transformation’ to illustrate the limitations of the standard approach and demonstrate the potential of a digital approach to scenario building. We conclude that standard scenario planning is often characterised by a systematic omission of potentially critical scenarios, which our proposed digital approach can detect and map out.

Systems Research and Behavioral ScienceVol. 42(2)
University of Turku (FI), Kazimieras Simonavičius University (LT), Excelia Business School (FR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.