Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study

Background and AimsRoutine group and save (G&S) is commonly performed before appendicectomy despite limited evidence. This study aims to evaluate the necessity of preoperative G&S by determining perioperative blood transfusion rates.MethodsA multicentre retrospective observational study of adult patients who had emergency appendicectomy across four hospitals between August 2018 and November 2020. Data analysed included demographics, operative details, G&S, crossmatching and perioperative blood transfusion.Results1105 patients were identified, 635 (57.4%) were male. Median age was 37 years (IQR 26-52). 1012 (91.6%) were ASA 1 or 2. Surgical approach: 890 (80.5%) laparoscopic, 79 (7.1%) converted to open, 119 (10.8%) open and 17 (1.5%) laparotomy. Severity of appendicitis: 804 (72.8%) inflamed, 56 (5.1%) gangrenous, 235 (21.3%) perforated and 10 (0.9%) normal. 921 (83.3%) patients had preoperative G&S. 42 (3.8%) patients also had crossmatch. No patients required blood transfusion in 30 days post appendicectomy. The cost of G&S is estimated to be £40,164 in this cohort.ConclusionsThe need for perioperative blood transfusion is rare in patients undergoing appendicectomy. It has a significant cost impact and can cause unnecessary delays. Our study suggests that a routine G&S policy is not necessary, and we suggest a more 'selective' G&S policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scottish Medical Journal
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330241307338
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study

Khurram Khan, Jeeva Karuniya Sundarraj, IAN F. ROBERTSON
3 citations
Scottish Medical Journal
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
2.07
article

Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study

Khurram Khan, Jeeva Karuniya Sundarraj, IAN F. ROBERTSON
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Background and AimsRoutine group and save (G&S) is commonly performed before appendicectomy despite limited evidence. This study aims to evaluate the necessity of preoperative G&S by determining perioperative blood transfusion rates.MethodsA multicentre retrospective observational study of adult patients who had emergency appendicectomy across four hospitals between August 2018 and November 2020. Data analysed included demographics, operative details, G&S, crossmatching and perioperative blood transfusion.Results1105 patients were identified, 635 (57.4%) were male. Median age was 37 years (IQR 26-52). 1012 (91.6%) were ASA 1 or 2. Surgical approach: 890 (80.5%) laparoscopic, 79 (7.1%) converted to open, 119 (10.8%) open and 17 (1.5%) laparotomy. Severity of appendicitis: 804 (72.8%) inflamed, 56 (5.1%) gangrenous, 235 (21.3%) perforated and 10 (0.9%) normal. 921 (83.3%) patients had preoperative G&S. 42 (3.8%) patients also had crossmatch. No patients required blood transfusion in 30 days post appendicectomy. The cost of G&S is estimated to be £40,164 in this cohort.ConclusionsThe need for perioperative blood transfusion is rare in patients undergoing appendicectomy. It has a significant cost impact and can cause unnecessary delays. Our study suggests that a routine G&S policy is not necessary, and we suggest a more 'selective' G&S policy.

Scottish Medical JournalVol. 70(1)
Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB), Hairmyres Hospital (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
NHS Health Scotland
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study — Khurram Khan, Jeeva Karuniya Sundarraj, et al. · Scottish Medical Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS