Dual-separation enhanced methane reforming system analysis: Understanding carbon-hydrogen synergy for low-carbon hydrogen production

• A dual-separation enhanced methane reforming system is established. • System analyses reveal the irreversible loss distribution and reduction mechanisms. • The system’s exergy efficiency is 18.19% (abs.) higher than in industrial reforming. • The ordered conversion of carbon and hydrogen achieves low-energy H 2 production. Hydrogen is recognized as a sustainable energy carrier and is expected to play a crucial role in the future energy structure, which has now become a global consensus. However, current hydrogen production primarily relies on fossil fuels, accompanied by the substantial amounts of CO 2 emissions. The conventional sequential approach involves hydrogen production followed by CO 2 capture, with these processes occurring independently, suffering from low hydrogen production efficiency and high CO 2 capture penalty. To address these issues, we proposed an integrated approach that has achieved high-purity hydrogen production and CO 2 capture at mild temperatures ranging from 400 to 500 °C, where the H 2 separation is performed by a Pd-Ag membrane and the in-situ CO 2 capture is performed by sorbents. To evaluate the potential energy and exergy advantages of this integrated method, a systematic analysis of dual-separation enhanced methane reforming is performed using industrial steam methane reforming (SMR) as a reference system, revealing the irreversible loss distribution and reduction mechanism in the process. The results show that the new system achieves an energy efficiency of 79.12 % and an exergy efficiency of 80.01 %, which are 9.34 and 18.19 percentage points higher than those of the industrial SMR, respectively. The enhanced efficiency and reduced irreversible losses are attributed to factors such as the reduction in the grade difference between the energy-donating and energy-accepting sides, the integration of the “reforming-shift-purify-capture” processes, and the reduced energy penalties for dual separation. The equivalent methane consumption is defined and calculated, and the new system has an energy consumption of 0.455 m 3 -CH 4 m −3 -H 2 , which is 19.9 % lower than that of industrial SMR with CO 2 capture (i.e., sequential approach). The system analysis provides a deeper understanding of the advantages of the integrated hydrogen production system and underscores the significance of the ordered conversion and synergy between carbon-based and hydrogen-based components from methane, clarifying the future optimization directions for the hydrogen production system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119280
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual-separation enhanced methane reforming system analysis: Understanding carbon-hydrogen synergy for low-carbon hydrogen production

Xiao Li, Gang Pei, Mingkai Liu, Yong Hao et al.
2 citations
Energy Conversion and Management
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.21
article

Dual-separation enhanced methane reforming system analysis: Understanding carbon-hydrogen synergy for low-carbon hydrogen production

Xiao Li, Gang Pei, Mingkai Liu, Yong Hao, Bin Wang, Lingzhi Yang, Ke Guo, Yu Shao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• A dual-separation enhanced methane reforming system is established. • System analyses reveal the irreversible loss distribution and reduction mechanisms. • The system’s exergy efficiency is 18.19% (abs.) higher than in industrial reforming. • The ordered conversion of carbon and hydrogen achieves low-energy H 2 production. Hydrogen is recognized as a sustainable energy carrier and is expected to play a crucial role in the future energy structure, which has now become a global consensus. However, current hydrogen production primarily relies on fossil fuels, accompanied by the substantial amounts of CO 2 emissions. The conventional sequential approach involves hydrogen production followed by CO 2 capture, with these processes occurring independently, suffering from low hydrogen production efficiency and high CO 2 capture penalty. To address these issues, we proposed an integrated approach that has achieved high-purity hydrogen production and CO 2 capture at mild temperatures ranging from 400 to 500 °C, where the H 2 separation is performed by a Pd-Ag membrane and the in-situ CO 2 capture is performed by sorbents. To evaluate the potential energy and exergy advantages of this integrated method, a systematic analysis of dual-separation enhanced methane reforming is performed using industrial steam methane reforming (SMR) as a reference system, revealing the irreversible loss distribution and reduction mechanism in the process. The results show that the new system achieves an energy efficiency of 79.12 % and an exergy efficiency of 80.01 %, which are 9.34 and 18.19 percentage points higher than those of the industrial SMR, respectively. The enhanced efficiency and reduced irreversible losses are attributed to factors such as the reduction in the grade difference between the energy-donating and energy-accepting sides, the integration of the “reforming-shift-purify-capture” processes, and the reduced energy penalties for dual separation. The equivalent methane consumption is defined and calculated, and the new system has an energy consumption of 0.455 m 3 -CH 4 m −3 -H 2 , which is 19.9 % lower than that of industrial SMR with CO 2 capture (i.e., sequential approach). The system analysis provides a deeper understanding of the advantages of the integrated hydrogen production system and underscores the significance of the ordered conversion and synergy between carbon-based and hydrogen-based components from methane, clarifying the future optimization directions for the hydrogen production system.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 325
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), North China Electric Power University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Engineering Thermophysics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.