Parents’ and informal caregivers’ experiences of accessing childhood vaccination services within the United Kingdom: a systematic scoping review of empirical evidence

Accessibility is poorly conceptualised within most of the research conducted on childhood immunisation uptake within the UK. This, in part, is because exploring accessibility was not an explicit objective of many of the studies included in the review. It is vital that the accessibility of childhood vaccination services is given greater priority and appropriately defined in empirical research. Otherwise, researchers run the risk of limiting the scope of their findings based on their own conceptual ideas regarding the drivers of poor uptake rather than the lived reality of parents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20981-0
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parents’ and informal caregivers’ experiences of accessing childhood vaccination services within the United Kingdom: a systematic scoping review of empirical evidence

Sandra Mounier‐Jack, Louise Letley, Georgia Chisnall, Tracey Chantler et al.
4 citations
BMC Public Health
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
2.11
article

Parents’ and informal caregivers’ experiences of accessing childhood vaccination services within the United Kingdom: a systematic scoping review of empirical evidence

Sandra Mounier‐Jack, Louise Letley, Georgia Chisnall, Tracey Chantler, Samar Hersh-Toubia
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Accessibility is poorly conceptualised within most of the research conducted on childhood immunisation uptake within the UK. This, in part, is because exploring accessibility was not an explicit objective of many of the studies included in the review. It is vital that the accessibility of childhood vaccination services is given greater priority and appropriately defined in empirical research. Otherwise, researchers run the risk of limiting the scope of their findings based on their own conceptual ideas regarding the drivers of poor uptake rather than the lived reality of parents.

BMC Public HealthVol. 24(1)
University of London (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Against Violence & Abuse (GB), End Violence Against Women (GB)
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parents’ and informal caregivers’ experiences of accessing childhood vaccination services within the United Kingdom: a systematic scoping review of empirical evidence — Sandra Mounier‐Jack, Louise Letley, et al. · BMC Public Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS