Understanding the mechanisms underlying the socioeconomic disparities in cancer screening among Australian women

This study is the first to investigate the effects of individual level SES on cancer screening in Australia and one of the few studies to examine underlying mechanisms simultaneously across various screening programs. Reducing stress and improving screening literacy may help to improve cancer screening participation among low SES individuals. Our results also suggest that tailoring interventions to the SES background of women may not enhance their effectiveness. Interventions aiming to reduce the SES screening disparities may achieve more success through addressing underlying mechanisms as opposed to the behavioural barriers themselves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20901-2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the mechanisms underlying the socioeconomic disparities in cancer screening among Australian women

L. E. Anderson, Michael Ireland, Claire Nightingale, Larry Myers et al.
3 citations
BMC Public Health
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.85
article

Understanding the mechanisms underlying the socioeconomic disparities in cancer screening among Australian women

L. E. Anderson, Michael Ireland, Claire Nightingale, Larry Myers, Belinda C. Goodwin, Nicole Perry
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study is the first to investigate the effects of individual level SES on cancer screening in Australia and one of the few studies to examine underlying mechanisms simultaneously across various screening programs. Reducing stress and improving screening literacy may help to improve cancer screening participation among low SES individuals. Our results also suggest that tailoring interventions to the SES background of women may not enhance their effectiveness. Interventions aiming to reduce the SES screening disparities may achieve more success through addressing underlying mechanisms as opposed to the behavioural barriers themselves.

BMC Public HealthVol. 24(1)
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Southern Queensland (AU), Cancer Council Queensland (AU)
Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation, University of Southern Queensland
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.