Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation with Area Disagreement

We propose Area Disagreement, a novel uncertainty estimation method for Active Learning in the context of Semantic Segmentation, which capitalizes on the unique characteristics of the task. It relies on the assumption that slight alterations to the learner model's parameters should not produce significant differences in the output, specifically in terms of predicted shapes and objects given the same input image. While a small amount of contradiction is natural, larger inconsistencies suggest that the model's internal representation of the world is perplexed by those images, thus making them valuable for further training. Our uncertainty estimation method prioritizes images with a smaller Dice Coefficient relative to the average prediction, based on multiple Monte-Carlo Dropout inferences. Utilizing this approach, we outperformed baseline methods by a wide margin on the Cityscapes dataset, achieving 95% of the full-scale training performance using only 36% of the dataset and 97.5% of the full-scale training performance using 47 % of the dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccp63557.2024.10793045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation with Area Disagreement

Razvan Itu, Flavius Cristian Fetean
1 citations
Machine Learning and Algorithms
0.35
article

Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation with Area Disagreement

Razvan Itu, Flavius Cristian Fetean
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We propose Area Disagreement, a novel uncertainty estimation method for Active Learning in the context of Semantic Segmentation, which capitalizes on the unique characteristics of the task. It relies on the assumption that slight alterations to the learner model's parameters should not produce significant differences in the output, specifically in terms of predicted shapes and objects given the same input image. While a small amount of contradiction is natural, larger inconsistencies suggest that the model's internal representation of the world is perplexed by those images, thus making them valuable for further training. Our uncertainty estimation method prioritizes images with a smaller Dice Coefficient relative to the average prediction, based on multiple Monte-Carlo Dropout inferences. Utilizing this approach, we outperformed baseline methods by a wide margin on the Cityscapes dataset, achieving 95% of the full-scale training performance using only 36% of the dataset and 97.5% of the full-scale training performance using 47 % of the dataset.

Technical University of Cluj-Napoca (RO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Machine Learning and Algorithms
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.