Informative Performance Measures for Continual Reinforcement Learning

In this article, we perform continual reinforcement learning (CRL) experiments using two benchmarks that rely on a physically simulated robot with a differential drive. CRL is a flavor of reinforcement learning (RL) in which environments themselves are taken to be non-stationary, which we model here by abrupt changes in observations and rewards, termed tasks. In particular, we demonstrate that deep Q-learning (DQN) with experience replay suffers from conflicting objectives in such a scenario: on the one hand, the replay buffers must be large to prevent catastrophic forgetting (CF), but, on the other hand, they should be small to enable rapid learning of new statistics. Taking inspiration from the domain of supervised continual learning (CL), we generalize common learning and forgetting measures in CL and show that they are highly indicative of typical effects in CRL: forgetting, intransigence, and, surprisingly, backwards transfer, i.e., the improvement of policies for past tasks by current learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccp63557.2024.10793039
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informative Performance Measures for Continual Reinforcement Learning

Alexander Gepperth, Benedikt Bagus, Alexander Krawczyk, Yannick Denker
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
article

Informative Performance Measures for Continual Reinforcement Learning

Alexander Gepperth, Benedikt Bagus, Alexander Krawczyk, Yannick Denker
article en

Abstract

In this article, we perform continual reinforcement learning (CRL) experiments using two benchmarks that rely on a physically simulated robot with a differential drive. CRL is a flavor of reinforcement learning (RL) in which environments themselves are taken to be non-stationary, which we model here by abrupt changes in observations and rewards, termed tasks. In particular, we demonstrate that deep Q-learning (DQN) with experience replay suffers from conflicting objectives in such a scenario: on the one hand, the replay buffers must be large to prevent catastrophic forgetting (CF), but, on the other hand, they should be small to enable rapid learning of new statistics. Taking inspiration from the domain of supervised continual learning (CL), we generalize common learning and forgetting measures in CL and show that they are highly indicative of typical effects in CRL: forgetting, intransigence, and, surprisingly, backwards transfer, i.e., the improvement of policies for past tasks by current learning.

Fulda University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Informative Performance Measures for Continual Reinforcement Learning — Alexander Gepperth, Benedikt Bagus, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS