Do personal recommendations need to be personalized? Investigating the relationships between student differences and educational recommendations

Abstract Educational recommender systems have been supporting personalized learning in various ways. However, less discussion is conducted about whether and how to personalize the strategies to generate recommendations based on student differences. In this study, we aim at investigating how students judge recommendations based on different strategies, and how these judgments relate to student characteristics. We conducted a large-scale questionnaire survey to measure students’ Big-Five personality traits, confidence in the subjects, and their judgments on six types of recommendations. The answers collected from 735 high school students in Japan indicate that students had different judgments across different recommendation strategies, but similarly for English and mathematics. Furthermore, the correlations between student characteristics and their judgments on recommendations were stronger if the subject to learn was inconsistent with the subject they preferred. The results provide insights on how to design educational recommendations that not only cater to students’ traits, but also help foster and enhance their traits for better learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Learning Environments
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00349-y
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do personal recommendations need to be personalized? Investigating the relationships between student differences and educational recommendations

Brendan Flanagan, Yiling Dai, Kyosuke Takami, Hiroaki Ogata et al.
Smart Learning Environments
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Do personal recommendations need to be personalized? Investigating the relationships between student differences and educational recommendations

Brendan Flanagan, Yiling Dai, Kyosuke Takami, Hiroaki Ogata, Heinz Ulrich Hoppe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Educational recommender systems have been supporting personalized learning in various ways. However, less discussion is conducted about whether and how to personalize the strategies to generate recommendations based on student differences. In this study, we aim at investigating how students judge recommendations based on different strategies, and how these judgments relate to student characteristics. We conducted a large-scale questionnaire survey to measure students’ Big-Five personality traits, confidence in the subjects, and their judgments on six types of recommendations. The answers collected from 735 high school students in Japan indicate that students had different judgments across different recommendation strategies, but similarly for English and mathematics. Furthermore, the correlations between student characteristics and their judgments on recommendations were stronger if the subject to learn was inconsistent with the subject they preferred. The results provide insights on how to design educational recommendations that not only cater to students’ traits, but also help foster and enhance their traits for better learning.

Smart Learning EnvironmentsVol. 11(1)
Kyoto University (JP), National Institute for Educational Policy Research (JP)
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.