DIGITALIZATION OF JUSTICE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ELECTRONIC CRIMINAL CASE: QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE

The article examines the foreign experience of digitalization of justice and the development of artificial intelligence in the context of the transition to an electronic format of criminal cases. In conclusion, the authors conclude that, given the predominance of the conservative view of law enforcement officers and the legislator of the Russian Federation, only minor steps are currently taking place towards the digitalization of justice in Russia. At the same time, it was found that the introduction of various information systems and automated workplaces into practical activities, which involved the creation of a single system and a wide-ranging network, did not occur, due to the lack of a single request from the system of investigative bodies and technical capabilities, as well as the absence of an urgent need to change the order of work on the part of investigators and interrogators

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v15i2.2032
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIGITALIZATION OF JUSTICE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ELECTRONIC CRIMINAL CASE: QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE

А. Г. Волеводз, Александр Владимирович Токолов, Елена Николаевна Клещина, Sergey Nuikin et al.
Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR
Digital Transformation in Law
article

DIGITALIZATION OF JUSTICE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ELECTRONIC CRIMINAL CASE: QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE

А. Г. Волеводз, Александр Владимирович Токолов, Елена Николаевна Клещина, Sergey Nuikin, Zlatoslava Khmeleva
article en

Abstract

The article examines the foreign experience of digitalization of justice and the development of artificial intelligence in the context of the transition to an electronic format of criminal cases. In conclusion, the authors conclude that, given the predominance of the conservative view of law enforcement officers and the legislator of the Russian Federation, only minor steps are currently taking place towards the digitalization of justice in Russia. At the same time, it was found that the introduction of various information systems and automated workplaces into practical activities, which involved the creation of a single system and a wide-ranging network, did not occur, due to the lack of a single request from the system of investigative bodies and technical capabilities, as well as the absence of an urgent need to change the order of work on the part of investigators and interrogators

Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFORVol. 15(2)
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU), Financial University (RU), Government of Russia (RU), Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU), Ministry of Internal Affairs (RO), Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DIGITALIZATION OF JUSTICE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ELECTRONIC CRIMINAL CASE: QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE — А. Г. Волеводз, Александр Владимирович Токолов, et al. · Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS