Climate change impacts of biological treatment of liquid digestate from the anaerobic digestion of food waste

The liquid fraction of digestate (LFD) from anaerobic digestion of food waste contains high nitrogen concentrations, and in some countries, the LFD is treated as wastewater. We modelled alternative LFD treatments, including pretreatment with the partial nitritation Anammox (PNA) process. The PNA effluent is discharged to the sewers to undergo further treatment by conventional nitrification and (post- or pre-) denitrification. Life-cycle inventories were developed for the LFD treatment alternatives, including N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and electricity consumption estimates. The climate change (CC) impact was estimated using life cycle assessment in three different energy systems ranging from fossil-based to fully renewable. In the fossil energy system, pretreatment with PNA was attractive, while in the more renewable energy systems, the PNA process did not improve the CC account due to high N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Pre-denitrification is the most attractive LFD treatment technology in a fully renewable energy system. Linking the LFD treatment to the anaerobic digestion of food waste showed that LFD treatment is a significant contributor to the overall CC account. As we move towards less fossil-based electricity, the anaerobic digestion of food waste constitutes a CC load of 350-450 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/tonne biowaste, of which up to a third can be attributed to the LFD treatment. The N<sub>2</sub>O emissions are the main contributor, constituting up to 50 % in a fossil-based energy system and even higher in a renewable energy system. We conclude that the LFD treatment must be addressed in assessing anaerobic digestion when the LFD is discharged to the sewer. Our study also points to the need to find alternative ways of managing the LFD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.12.013
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate change impacts of biological treatment of liquid digestate from the anaerobic digestion of food waste

Borja Valverde‐Pérez, Valentina Bisinella, Anna Sofie Varling, Thomas H. Christensen et al.
5 citations
Waste Management
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
0.66
article

Climate change impacts of biological treatment of liquid digestate from the anaerobic digestion of food waste

Borja Valverde‐Pérez, Valentina Bisinella, Anna Sofie Varling, Thomas H. Christensen, Vasileios Chrysochoidis
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The liquid fraction of digestate (LFD) from anaerobic digestion of food waste contains high nitrogen concentrations, and in some countries, the LFD is treated as wastewater. We modelled alternative LFD treatments, including pretreatment with the partial nitritation Anammox (PNA) process. The PNA effluent is discharged to the sewers to undergo further treatment by conventional nitrification and (post- or pre-) denitrification. Life-cycle inventories were developed for the LFD treatment alternatives, including N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and electricity consumption estimates. The climate change (CC) impact was estimated using life cycle assessment in three different energy systems ranging from fossil-based to fully renewable. In the fossil energy system, pretreatment with PNA was attractive, while in the more renewable energy systems, the PNA process did not improve the CC account due to high N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Pre-denitrification is the most attractive LFD treatment technology in a fully renewable energy system. Linking the LFD treatment to the anaerobic digestion of food waste showed that LFD treatment is a significant contributor to the overall CC account. As we move towards less fossil-based electricity, the anaerobic digestion of food waste constitutes a CC load of 350-450 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/tonne biowaste, of which up to a third can be attributed to the LFD treatment. The N<sub>2</sub>O emissions are the main contributor, constituting up to 50 % in a fossil-based energy system and even higher in a renewable energy system. We conclude that the LFD treatment must be addressed in assessing anaerobic digestion when the LFD is discharged to the sewer. Our study also points to the need to find alternative ways of managing the LFD.

Waste ManagementVol. 193
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.