Maatschappelijke onrust en de toekomst van bewaken en beveiligen

Social unrest and the future of surveillance and protection In this contribution, the authors outline current threats against politicians and policymakers in the Netherlands and consider it unlikely that these threats will decrease in the coming years. Subsequently, they describe the development of the protection and surveillance framework into a new framework. The authors recognize the significant pressure on this frameworks’ capacity and regard it as a last resort for threats that they consider unacceptable. This requires a twofold response: on the one hand, investing in the frameworks’ capacity, and on the other hand, reducing the threat. It is commendable that the Public Prosecution Service sets boundaries and that individuals who pose threats are being punished. At the same time, the authors emphasize the importance of public support for our representatives and policies to deal with the threat itself.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Justitiële verkenningen
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/jv/016758502024050004012
Primary Topic
Dutch Social and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maatschappelijke onrust en de toekomst van bewaken en beveiligen

Edwin Bakker, Roy Hofkamp
Justitiële verkenningen
Dutch Social and Cultural Studies
article

Maatschappelijke onrust en de toekomst van bewaken en beveiligen

Edwin Bakker, Roy Hofkamp
article en

Abstract

Social unrest and the future of surveillance and protection In this contribution, the authors outline current threats against politicians and policymakers in the Netherlands and consider it unlikely that these threats will decrease in the coming years. Subsequently, they describe the development of the protection and surveillance framework into a new framework. The authors recognize the significant pressure on this frameworks’ capacity and regard it as a last resort for threats that they consider unacceptable. This requires a twofold response: on the one hand, investing in the frameworks’ capacity, and on the other hand, reducing the threat. It is commendable that the Public Prosecution Service sets boundaries and that individuals who pose threats are being punished. At the same time, the authors emphasize the importance of public support for our representatives and policies to deal with the threat itself.

Justitiële verkenningenVol. 50(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Dutch Social and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.