Be Careful in Multimessenger Inference of the Hubble Constant: A Path Forward for Robust Inference

Abstract Multimessenger observations of coalescing binary neutron stars (BNSs) using gravitational-wave (GW) and electromagnetic- (EM) wave signals are a direct probe of the expansion history of the Universe and carry the potential to shed light on the disparity between low- and high-redshift measurements of the Hubble constant H 0 . To measure the value of H 0 with such observations requires pristine inference of the luminosity distance and the true source redshift with minimal impact from systematics. In this analysis, we carry out joint inference on mock GW signals and their EM afterglows from BNS coalescences and find that the inclination angle inferred from the afterglow light curve and apparent superluminal motion can be precise but need not be accurate and is subject to a systematic uncertainty that could be as large as 1.5 σ . This produces a disparity between the EM and GW inferred inclination angles, which if not carefully treated when combining observations can bias the inferred value of H 0 . We also find that already small misalignments of 3°–6° between the inherent system inclinations for the GW and EM emission can bias the inference by <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>–</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> if not taken into account. As multimessenger BNS observations are rare, we must make the most out of a small number of events and harness the increased precision while avoiding a reduced accuracy. We demonstrate how to mitigate these potential sources of bias by jointly inferring the mismatch between the GW- and EM-based inclination angles and H 0 .