Within‐leaf variation in embolism resistance is not a rule for compound‐leaved angiosperms

We conclude that within-leaf hydraulic segmentation, caused by variation in embolism resistance, is not a universal phenomenon to compound-leaved species and that the presence of a pulvinus does not provide a barrier to embolism spread in compound leaves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Botany
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16447
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Within‐leaf variation in embolism resistance is not a rule for compound‐leaved angiosperms

Scott A. M. McAdam, Ian M. Rimer
4 citations
American Journal of Botany
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.13
article

Within‐leaf variation in embolism resistance is not a rule for compound‐leaved angiosperms

Scott A. M. McAdam, Ian M. Rimer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

We conclude that within-leaf hydraulic segmentation, caused by variation in embolism resistance, is not a universal phenomenon to compound-leaved species and that the presence of a pulvinus does not provide a barrier to embolism spread in compound leaves.

American Journal of BotanyVol. 111(12)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
National Science Foundation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.