Multiple Myeloma: Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers with Clinical Potential

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells and accounts for approximately 10% of all hematologic malignancies. The clinical outcomes of MM can exhibit considerable variability. Variability in both the genetic and epigenetic characteristics of MM undeniably contributes to tumor dynamics. The aim of the present study was to identify biomarkers with the potential to improve the accuracy of prognosis assessment in MM. Initially, miRNA sequencing was conducted on bone marrow (BM) samples from patients with MM. Subsequently, the expression levels of 27 microRNAs (miRNA) and the gene expression levels of ASF1B, CD82B, CRISP3, FN1, MEF2B, PD-L1, PPARγ, TERT, TIMP1, TOP2A, and TP53 were evaluated via real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in BM samples from patients with MM exhibiting favorable and unfavorable prognoses. Additionally, the analysis involved the bone marrow samples from patients undergoing examinations for non-cancerous blood diseases (NCBD). The findings indicate a statistically significant increase in the expression levels of miRNA-124, -138, -10a, -126, -143, -146b, -20a, -21, -29b, and let-7a and a decrease in the expression level of miRNA-96 in the MM group compared with NCBD (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were detected in the expression levels of the selected miRNAs between the unfavorable and favorable prognoses in MM groups. The expression levels of ASF1B, CD82B, and CRISP3 were significantly decreased, while those of FN1, MEF2B, PDL1, PPARγ, and TERT were significantly increased in the MM group compared to the NCBD group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The MM group with a favorable prognosis demonstrated a statistically significant decline in TIMP1 expression and a significant increase in CD82B and CRISP3 expression compared to the MM group with an unfavorable prognosis (<i>p</i> < 0.05). From an empirical point of view, we have established that the complex biomarker encompassing the CRISP3/TIMP1 expression ratio holds promise as a prognostic marker in MM. From a fundamental point of view, we have demonstrated that the development of MM is rooted in a cascade of complex molecular pathways, demonstrating the interplay of genetic and epigenetic factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413404
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple Myeloma: Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers with Clinical Potential

S. A. Demakov, Т. И. Поспелова, Igor B. Kovynev, Н. В. Скворцова et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
0.45
article

Multiple Myeloma: Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers with Clinical Potential

S. A. Demakov, Т. И. Поспелова, Igor B. Kovynev, Н. В. Скворцова, С. Е. Титов, П. С. Деменков, Yu. A. Veryaskina, И. Ф. Жимулев, О. В. Антоненко, Mikhail Ivanov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells and accounts for approximately 10% of all hematologic malignancies. The clinical outcomes of MM can exhibit considerable variability. Variability in both the genetic and epigenetic characteristics of MM undeniably contributes to tumor dynamics. The aim of the present study was to identify biomarkers with the potential to improve the accuracy of prognosis assessment in MM. Initially, miRNA sequencing was conducted on bone marrow (BM) samples from patients with MM. Subsequently, the expression levels of 27 microRNAs (miRNA) and the gene expression levels of ASF1B, CD82B, CRISP3, FN1, MEF2B, PD-L1, PPARγ, TERT, TIMP1, TOP2A, and TP53 were evaluated via real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in BM samples from patients with MM exhibiting favorable and unfavorable prognoses. Additionally, the analysis involved the bone marrow samples from patients undergoing examinations for non-cancerous blood diseases (NCBD). The findings indicate a statistically significant increase in the expression levels of miRNA-124, -138, -10a, -126, -143, -146b, -20a, -21, -29b, and let-7a and a decrease in the expression level of miRNA-96 in the MM group compared with NCBD (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were detected in the expression levels of the selected miRNAs between the unfavorable and favorable prognoses in MM groups. The expression levels of ASF1B, CD82B, and CRISP3 were significantly decreased, while those of FN1, MEF2B, PDL1, PPARγ, and TERT were significantly increased in the MM group compared to the NCBD group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The MM group with a favorable prognosis demonstrated a statistically significant decline in TIMP1 expression and a significant increase in CD82B and CRISP3 expression compared to the MM group with an unfavorable prognosis (<i>p</i> < 0.05). From an empirical point of view, we have established that the complex biomarker encompassing the CRISP3/TIMP1 expression ratio holds promise as a prognostic marker in MM. From a fundamental point of view, we have demonstrated that the development of MM is rooted in a cascade of complex molecular pathways, demonstrating the interplay of genetic and epigenetic factors.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 25(24)
Novosibirsk State Medical University (RU), State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology VECTOR (RU), Institute of Cytology and Genetics (RU), Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Science Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.