Evaluation of Phenolic Foam's Toxicity Used in Floral Arrangements

Abstract The study investigates the characterization and toxicity of two types of phenolic foams: Floral (FF) and Hydroponic (HF), used in floral arrangements and hydroponic structures. These foams contain a resin with a free phenol content ranging between 5.0% and 8.0%, a substance harmful to plant development and ecosystem contamination. Methods such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy‐energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM‐EDS), and gas chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (GC‐MS/MS) are used for characterization. Acute exposure ecotoxicological tests are conducted with Daphnia magna for the FF sample and lettuce seeds ( Lactuca sativa ) for both FF and HF samples. Results reveal structural similarities between the foams and phenolic resin, including the presence of residual free phenol at concentrations of 180 ppm in FF and 73 ppm in HF, and possibly different additive treatments between samples. The FF sample had a half maximal effective concentration (EC 50 , 48 h) = 15.4 ± 2.7 g L −1 for D. magna . Surprisingly, the HF sample proves more toxic to L. sativa than FF, suggesting a potential influence of additives released from the sample's composition beyond the free phenol. This study shows that improper phenolic foam disposal can harm both aquatic and land ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Macromolecular Symposia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.202400054
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Lignin and Wood Chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Phenolic Foam's Toxicity Used in Floral Arrangements

Adriane Martins de Freitas, Bianca Sousa, Juliana Regina Kloss, Wanessa Algarte Ramsdorf et al.
2 citations
Macromolecular Symposia
Lignin and Wood Chemistry
0.37
article

Evaluation of Phenolic Foam's Toxicity Used in Floral Arrangements

Adriane Martins de Freitas, Bianca Sousa, Juliana Regina Kloss, Wanessa Algarte Ramsdorf, Laís M. de Brito
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The study investigates the characterization and toxicity of two types of phenolic foams: Floral (FF) and Hydroponic (HF), used in floral arrangements and hydroponic structures. These foams contain a resin with a free phenol content ranging between 5.0% and 8.0%, a substance harmful to plant development and ecosystem contamination. Methods such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy‐energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM‐EDS), and gas chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (GC‐MS/MS) are used for characterization. Acute exposure ecotoxicological tests are conducted with Daphnia magna for the FF sample and lettuce seeds ( Lactuca sativa ) for both FF and HF samples. Results reveal structural similarities between the foams and phenolic resin, including the presence of residual free phenol at concentrations of 180 ppm in FF and 73 ppm in HF, and possibly different additive treatments between samples. The FF sample had a half maximal effective concentration (EC 50 , 48 h) = 15.4 ± 2.7 g L −1 for D. magna . Surprisingly, the HF sample proves more toxic to L. sativa than FF, suggesting a potential influence of additives released from the sample's composition beyond the free phenol. This study shows that improper phenolic foam disposal can harm both aquatic and land ecosystems.

Macromolecular SymposiaVol. 413(6)
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Lignin and Wood Chemistry
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.