The Unbroken Circle: From Child Analysis to Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT) with Children, Adolescents, and Families

It is now more than 30 years since Peter Fonagy published his classic 1991 paper introducing the concept of "mentalization" into the psychoanalytic literature, and in the period since then mentalization-based treatment (MBT) has emerged as an important therapeutic approach. In reviewing the history of this treatment, it is often assumed that MBT emerged at the interface between three domains: first, the developmental research on theory of mind; second, the clinical challenges of treating borderline personality disorder; and third, the empirical research on intergenerational patterns of attachment. This article suggests that there was one more domain, which was equally important to the development of MBT and which is perhaps less widely recognized. This fourth domain was developments in child analysis, especially those taking place during the late 1980s and early 1990s at the Anna Freud Centre in London. Although the origins of MBT theory and technique in child work is perhaps not widely acknowledged, recognizing these roots helps us to better understand mentalizing therapy. It also enables us to see how the development of MBT for children, young people, and families can be understood as a closing of the circle in the development of mentalization-based interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2024.52.4.452
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Unbroken Circle: From Child Analysis to Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT) with Children, Adolescents, and Families

Nick Midgley
2 citations
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
1.28
article

The Unbroken Circle: From Child Analysis to Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT) with Children, Adolescents, and Families

Nick Midgley
article en
2 citations

Abstract

It is now more than 30 years since Peter Fonagy published his classic 1991 paper introducing the concept of "mentalization" into the psychoanalytic literature, and in the period since then mentalization-based treatment (MBT) has emerged as an important therapeutic approach. In reviewing the history of this treatment, it is often assumed that MBT emerged at the interface between three domains: first, the developmental research on theory of mind; second, the clinical challenges of treating borderline personality disorder; and third, the empirical research on intergenerational patterns of attachment. This article suggests that there was one more domain, which was equally important to the development of MBT and which is perhaps less widely recognized. This fourth domain was developments in child analysis, especially those taking place during the late 1980s and early 1990s at the Anna Freud Centre in London. Although the origins of MBT theory and technique in child work is perhaps not widely acknowledged, recognizing these roots helps us to better understand mentalizing therapy. It also enables us to see how the development of MBT for children, young people, and families can be understood as a closing of the circle in the development of mentalization-based interventions.

Psychodynamic PsychiatryVol. 52(4)
Anna Freud Centre (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.