Recognizing Social Injustice and Epistemic Mistrust in Helping Adolescents with Multiple Needs: The AMBIT (Adaptive Mentalization-Based Integrative Treatment) Approach

Epistemic trust-trust in the relevance and utility of social learning-is central to helping processes between clients and workers in helping services. Yet, due to their experiences, clients may <i>adaptively</i> develop predispositions toward stances of epistemic mistrust or epistemic credulity. From an AMBIT (adaptive mentalization-based integrative treatment) perspective, this article argues that epistemic mistrust and credulity are both <i>caused by</i> social injustice and <i>generate</i> further social injustice. Helping services commonly respond in ways that fail to acknowledge this social injustice and, perversely, deliver further injustice still. Our primary focus is how these issues relate to work with clients, but we argue that they are present in work within AMBIT's other foci, too: in teams, multiagency networks, and learning. We conclude that workers and helping services have a moral duty to recognize and attend to the multiple social injustices associated with epistemic mistrust and credulity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2024.52.4.584
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognizing Social Injustice and Epistemic Mistrust in Helping Adolescents with Multiple Needs: The AMBIT (Adaptive Mentalization-Based Integrative Treatment) Approach

Liz Cracknell, Dickon Bevington, Peter Fuggle
2 citations
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
1.28
article

Recognizing Social Injustice and Epistemic Mistrust in Helping Adolescents with Multiple Needs: The AMBIT (Adaptive Mentalization-Based Integrative Treatment) Approach

Liz Cracknell, Dickon Bevington, Peter Fuggle
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Epistemic trust-trust in the relevance and utility of social learning-is central to helping processes between clients and workers in helping services. Yet, due to their experiences, clients may <i>adaptively</i> develop predispositions toward stances of epistemic mistrust or epistemic credulity. From an AMBIT (adaptive mentalization-based integrative treatment) perspective, this article argues that epistemic mistrust and credulity are both <i>caused by</i> social injustice and <i>generate</i> further social injustice. Helping services commonly respond in ways that fail to acknowledge this social injustice and, perversely, deliver further injustice still. Our primary focus is how these issues relate to work with clients, but we argue that they are present in work within AMBIT's other foci, too: in teams, multiagency networks, and learning. We conclude that workers and helping services have a moral duty to recognize and attend to the multiple social injustices associated with epistemic mistrust and credulity.

Psychodynamic PsychiatryVol. 52(4)
Anna Freud Centre (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recognizing Social Injustice and Epistemic Mistrust in Helping Adolescents with Multiple Needs: The AMBIT (Adaptive Mentalization-Based Integrative Treatment) Approach — Liz Cracknell, Dickon Bevington, et al. · Psychodynamic Psychiatry (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS