Multidisciplinary optimization of an axial turbine

Abstract The results of three different optimization setups for an axial propeller turbine consisting of a guide vane, a runner and a draft tube are presented. The first setup only contains the efficiency as objective and the design head as a constraint. In the second setup, the minimization of the cavitation volume is added as a further objective while in the third, the compliance with a permissible stress is included as an additional constraint. Three operating points are simulated during the optimization. Comparing the results of the first two setups, the minimization of the cavitation volume leads to a lower plant efficiency at all operating points. Including structural mechanical aspects results in a further decrease of the plant efficiency at all operating points. Nevertheless, none of the best individuals from the setups have a maximum von Mises stress below the permissible stress without taking the structural stress limits into account. This points out the importance of considering both, structural as well as fluid mechanical aspects in the optimization process of hydraulic machines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1411/1/012012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidisciplinary optimization of an axial turbine

Alexander Tismer, Stefan Fraas, Stefan Riedelbauch
1 citations
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
1.77
article

Multidisciplinary optimization of an axial turbine

Alexander Tismer, Stefan Fraas, Stefan Riedelbauch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The results of three different optimization setups for an axial propeller turbine consisting of a guide vane, a runner and a draft tube are presented. The first setup only contains the efficiency as objective and the design head as a constraint. In the second setup, the minimization of the cavitation volume is added as a further objective while in the third, the compliance with a permissible stress is included as an additional constraint. Three operating points are simulated during the optimization. Comparing the results of the first two setups, the minimization of the cavitation volume leads to a lower plant efficiency at all operating points. Including structural mechanical aspects results in a further decrease of the plant efficiency at all operating points. Nevertheless, none of the best individuals from the setups have a maximum von Mises stress below the permissible stress without taking the structural stress limits into account. This points out the importance of considering both, structural as well as fluid mechanical aspects in the optimization process of hydraulic machines.

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceVol. 1411(1)
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.