A comparative analysis of CFD methodologies to predict the performance of Francis turbine

Abstract A Francis turbine’s flow characteristics strongly depend on the operating conditions. Accurately predicting the flow field within a turbine unit is challenging due to complex flow phenomena, such as separation around the turbine blades, pressure variations within the runner, and swirling flows in the draft tube. Various CFD methodologies can be employed to predict turbine performance. The present work evaluates the reliability of different CFD simulation methodologies in predicting turbine performance, focusing on the sensitivity of different turbulence models, grid types, and modeling approaches for accurate numerical solutions. Simulations are performed on a high-head Francis turbine under various operating conditions, including part load, Best Efficiency Point (BEP), and high load conditions, each representing a different turbine flow field. The simulation results are compared with experimental data from model tests to confirm the reliability of the numerical simulations for Francis turbines. The results show that the SST k-ω model with a hexahedral mesh (HH) is best suited for overall turbine performance prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1411/1/012009
Primary Topic
Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of CFD methodologies to predict the performance of Francis turbine

Chandra Shekhar Pant, Subodh Khullar, Arnab Mukherjee, Arun Kumar et al.
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
article

A comparative analysis of CFD methodologies to predict the performance of Francis turbine

Chandra Shekhar Pant, Subodh Khullar, Arnab Mukherjee, Arun Kumar, Mohammad Zehab Ud Din
article en

Abstract

Abstract A Francis turbine’s flow characteristics strongly depend on the operating conditions. Accurately predicting the flow field within a turbine unit is challenging due to complex flow phenomena, such as separation around the turbine blades, pressure variations within the runner, and swirling flows in the draft tube. Various CFD methodologies can be employed to predict turbine performance. The present work evaluates the reliability of different CFD simulation methodologies in predicting turbine performance, focusing on the sensitivity of different turbulence models, grid types, and modeling approaches for accurate numerical solutions. Simulations are performed on a high-head Francis turbine under various operating conditions, including part load, Best Efficiency Point (BEP), and high load conditions, each representing a different turbine flow field. The simulation results are compared with experimental data from model tests to confirm the reliability of the numerical simulations for Francis turbines. The results show that the SST k-ω model with a hexahedral mesh (HH) is best suited for overall turbine performance prediction.

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceVol. 1411(1)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN), National Institute of Hydrology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative analysis of CFD methodologies to predict the performance of Francis turbine — Chandra Shekhar Pant, Subodh Khullar, et al. · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS