Beyond Local Crime Rate: How the Quantity and Quality of Social Interaction Influence Crime in Private Residences, Commercial Venues, and Public Spaces

Measuring crime rates is challenging in neighborhoods and other small geographic units. Its denominator, the local population, is strongly affected by mobility, with most city dwellers moving through many neighborhoods during the course of one day for different purposes. Under these conditions, the use of the residential population returns a flawed representation of the social interactions that can lead to crime. In this article, alternative ways to measure local population for crime rates are tested. We suggest that different measures of local population (residents, shoppers, workers, pedestrians, automobiles) yield specific and relevant information for the understanding of the concentration of crime in time and space and that crime place (private residences, commercial venues, and public space) should be taken into account in spatial analyses of crime. Results show that different local population measures carry complementary information on the quantity and quality of social interaction that can lead to crime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj-2024-0001
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Local Crime Rate: How the Quantity and Quality of Social Interaction Influence Crime in Private Residences, Commercial Venues, and Public Spaces

Mathieu Charron
Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Beyond Local Crime Rate: How the Quantity and Quality of Social Interaction Influence Crime in Private Residences, Commercial Venues, and Public Spaces

Mathieu Charron
article en

Abstract

Measuring crime rates is challenging in neighborhoods and other small geographic units. Its denominator, the local population, is strongly affected by mobility, with most city dwellers moving through many neighborhoods during the course of one day for different purposes. Under these conditions, the use of the residential population returns a flawed representation of the social interactions that can lead to crime. In this article, alternative ways to measure local population for crime rates are tested. We suggest that different measures of local population (residents, shoppers, workers, pedestrians, automobiles) yield specific and relevant information for the understanding of the concentration of crime in time and space and that crime place (private residences, commercial venues, and public space) should be taken into account in spatial analyses of crime. Results show that different local population measures carry complementary information on the quantity and quality of social interaction that can lead to crime.

Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénaleVol. 66(3-4)
Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.