Facing the Dilemma of Forced Termination: What to Consider and Address When Removing a Member from a Group

The authors explore the group leader's considerations before removing a group member from group sessions. The authors integrate an approach that warns against a too hasty decision without considering the group-as-a-whole dynamics and the possibility of scapegoating, with the approach that looks at the group therapist's countertransference that prevents them from considering the group's best interest. The rule of thumb the authors suggest is that when a severe breach of the group agreement happens, especially continuously, and when it cannot be followed by exploration, reflection, and an agreement by the group member who violated the agreement to make an effort to avoid repeating this event, the group leader might consider removing the person from the group. The article distinguishes between removing a member in the early stages of the group and at later stages of the group's development. It also recommends exploring this issue with the group and following up with the removed member. Special attention is given to cases of racism, microaggressions, and trauma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2024.2420282
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facing the Dilemma of Forced Termination: What to Consider and Address When Removing a Member from a Group

Mitchel G. Adler, Haim Weinberg
1 citations
International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
2.23
article

Facing the Dilemma of Forced Termination: What to Consider and Address When Removing a Member from a Group

Mitchel G. Adler, Haim Weinberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The authors explore the group leader's considerations before removing a group member from group sessions. The authors integrate an approach that warns against a too hasty decision without considering the group-as-a-whole dynamics and the possibility of scapegoating, with the approach that looks at the group therapist's countertransference that prevents them from considering the group's best interest. The rule of thumb the authors suggest is that when a severe breach of the group agreement happens, especially continuously, and when it cannot be followed by exploration, reflection, and an agreement by the group member who violated the agreement to make an effort to avoid repeating this event, the group leader might consider removing the person from the group. The article distinguishes between removing a member in the early stages of the group and at later stages of the group's development. It also recommends exploring this issue with the group and following up with the removed member. Special attention is given to cases of racism, microaggressions, and trauma.

International Journal of Group PsychotherapyVol. 74(4)
Schlumberger (Ireland) (IE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.