Factors influencing students’ information channel preferences in finding sources for their final academic reports

Introduction. Understanding students' information channel preferences for information sources in academic tasks is crucial for improving library services. This study identifies factors influencing these preferences. Data Collection Methods. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 26 final-year students working on their theses, focusing on their selection of information channels. Data Analysis. The interview results were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Recurring themes were identified and categorized based on participants' responses, revealing common preferences for information sources. Results and Discussion. This study found that factors influencing the choice of information sources include the convenience, quantity, and quality of information sources provided by different channels. Additionally, users’ intentions, such as the need to obtain specific types of academic sources or the desire to personally own the acquired sources, also play a significant role. Therefore, academic libraries should ensure that their services are created, maintained, and developed based on users' experiences with existing library services to better meet their academic information needs and support them in completing their academic tasks. Conclusion. In today's academic world, students have diverse preferences for where they find information. Some lean towards the library, while others prefer the internet, especially for their final projects. Interestingly, some see both as useful for their research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v20i2.15663
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Literacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing students’ information channel preferences in finding sources for their final academic reports

Irvan Muliyadi
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
Library Science and Information Literacy
article

Factors influencing students’ information channel preferences in finding sources for their final academic reports

Irvan Muliyadi
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Understanding students' information channel preferences for information sources in academic tasks is crucial for improving library services. This study identifies factors influencing these preferences. Data Collection Methods. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 26 final-year students working on their theses, focusing on their selection of information channels. Data Analysis. The interview results were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Recurring themes were identified and categorized based on participants' responses, revealing common preferences for information sources. Results and Discussion. This study found that factors influencing the choice of information sources include the convenience, quantity, and quality of information sources provided by different channels. Additionally, users’ intentions, such as the need to obtain specific types of academic sources or the desire to personally own the acquired sources, also play a significant role. Therefore, academic libraries should ensure that their services are created, maintained, and developed based on users' experiences with existing library services to better meet their academic information needs and support them in completing their academic tasks. Conclusion. In today's academic world, students have diverse preferences for where they find information. Some lean towards the library, while others prefer the internet, especially for their final projects. Interestingly, some see both as useful for their research.

Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan InformasiVol. 20(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Library Science and Information Literacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.