Nursing documentation in rehabilitation: what work is visible?

Purpose: Nurses document their practice every day, however it is unclear whether this output fully reflects their contribution to client rehabilitation. This paper reports on one component of a larger study which aimed to understand the nature of nurses' documentation practice within the context of a brain injury facility in Aotearoa New Zealand. Design: Critical realist methodology underpinned case study methods within this doctoral research project. Methods: Descriptive analysis was used to explore the nurses' documentation patterns. Results: Our study demonstrated that the typical documentation practices of rehabilitation-nurses encompassed an impersonal, task completion style. This focused on recording that the physiological aspects of clients' routines were addressed, with little attention paid to coaching, education, and support roles. However, some documentation aspects revealed a shared language structure where nurses similarly articulated their inputs, such as a phased approach to teaching client's medication self-administration. Conclusions: The largely impersonal-regulatory style of documentation that was the normative cultural pattern within the facility, alongside the absence of nurses' rationales and team recommendations, rendered the breadth of the nursing contribution invisible. In contrast, when shared language was used, it gave nurses a structure, assisting in making those activities visible. This structure has potential to recognise and formalise these activities as legitimate 'rehabilitation nursing work' of relevance to nurses and other members of the team. Clinical Relevance: Rehabilitation nurse leaders should consider provision of documentation exemplars within text and standards documents. Additionally, documentation that guides shared language within nursing intervention areas has the potential to collectively empower nurses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33235/jarna.26.3.14-21
Primary Topic
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nursing documentation in rehabilitation: what work is visible?

Angela C Davenport, Margaret Jones, Peter Larmer, Kathryn McPherson
Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
article

Nursing documentation in rehabilitation: what work is visible?

Angela C Davenport, Margaret Jones, Peter Larmer, Kathryn McPherson
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Nurses document their practice every day, however it is unclear whether this output fully reflects their contribution to client rehabilitation. This paper reports on one component of a larger study which aimed to understand the nature of nurses' documentation practice within the context of a brain injury facility in Aotearoa New Zealand. Design: Critical realist methodology underpinned case study methods within this doctoral research project. Methods: Descriptive analysis was used to explore the nurses' documentation patterns. Results: Our study demonstrated that the typical documentation practices of rehabilitation-nurses encompassed an impersonal, task completion style. This focused on recording that the physiological aspects of clients' routines were addressed, with little attention paid to coaching, education, and support roles. However, some documentation aspects revealed a shared language structure where nurses similarly articulated their inputs, such as a phased approach to teaching client's medication self-administration. Conclusions: The largely impersonal-regulatory style of documentation that was the normative cultural pattern within the facility, alongside the absence of nurses' rationales and team recommendations, rendered the breadth of the nursing contribution invisible. In contrast, when shared language was used, it gave nurses a structure, assisting in making those activities visible. This structure has potential to recognise and formalise these activities as legitimate 'rehabilitation nursing work' of relevance to nurses and other members of the team. Clinical Relevance: Rehabilitation nurse leaders should consider provision of documentation exemplars within text and standards documents. Additionally, documentation that guides shared language within nursing intervention areas has the potential to collectively empower nurses.

Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses AssociationVol. 26(3)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.