Hukum Tata Negara Darurat dalam Perspektif HAM : Dilema Antara Keamanan Negara dan Hak Asasi Manusia

This research examines the dilemma between national security and human rights protection in the context of emergency constitutional law in Indonesia. Through a juridical-normative approach, this study analyzes the balance between state authority in dealing with emergencies and the obligation to protect citizens' human rights. The findings indicate that although the state can restrict human rights during emergencies, such restrictions must comply with the principles of necessity and proportionality and not violate non-derogable rights. Indonesia's experience implementing emergency constitutional law, such as in the cases of DOM Aceh and the COVID-19 pandemic response, demonstrates the importance of regulatory reform to create a more comprehensive legal framework in maintaining a balance between national security and human rights protection. This research recommends updating the State of Emergency Law to align with current developments and strengthen oversight mechanisms to prevent abuse of emergency powers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Birokrasi JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i4.1585
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hukum Tata Negara Darurat dalam Perspektif HAM : Dilema Antara Keamanan Negara dan Hak Asasi Manusia

M. Reza Saputra, Taufiqurrohman Syahuri, Irwan Triadi
1 citations
Birokrasi JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
4.07
article

Hukum Tata Negara Darurat dalam Perspektif HAM : Dilema Antara Keamanan Negara dan Hak Asasi Manusia

M. Reza Saputra, Taufiqurrohman Syahuri, Irwan Triadi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research examines the dilemma between national security and human rights protection in the context of emergency constitutional law in Indonesia. Through a juridical-normative approach, this study analyzes the balance between state authority in dealing with emergencies and the obligation to protect citizens' human rights. The findings indicate that although the state can restrict human rights during emergencies, such restrictions must comply with the principles of necessity and proportionality and not violate non-derogable rights. Indonesia's experience implementing emergency constitutional law, such as in the cases of DOM Aceh and the COVID-19 pandemic response, demonstrates the importance of regulatory reform to create a more comprehensive legal framework in maintaining a balance between national security and human rights protection. This research recommends updating the State of Emergency Law to align with current developments and strengthen oversight mechanisms to prevent abuse of emergency powers.

Birokrasi JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARAVol. 2(4)
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.