Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United States

Abstract Grassland bird populations are declining steeply, reflecting the degradation and loss of native grassland habitats. To assess how grazing management affects declining grassland bird populations, we compared breeding avifaunal communities in adaptive multi‐paddock (AMP) grazed and continuously grazed (CG) pastures in the Southeastern United States. AMP grazing involves alternating very short grazing periods at high animal densities with prolonged recovery periods across many small paddocks. Both the AMP and CG paddocks attracted obligate grassland birds during the breeding season; however, AMP‐grazed paddocks supported significantly higher detection of four obligate grassland breeding bird species. We used distance sampling techniques to account for differences in detectability for each species. The resulting densities for the grassland guild and Eastern Meadowlark as a species both revealed significantly higher densities within the AMP versus CG paddocks. Despite significantly more unadjusted detections of confirmed breeding ecotonal species, such as Blue Grosbeak, Eastern Bluebird, Brown Thrasher, Yellow‐breasted Chat, Eastern Towhee, Loggerhead Shrike, and Field Sparrow in AMP versus CG paddocks, no significant difference was found in the ecotonal guild after adjusting densities using effective detection radii. The CG paddocks supported fewer obligate grassland and ecotonal birds, with some exceptions (e.g., higher adjusted density of Eastern Bluebirds in CG) but supported comparable overall bird species richness. AMP grazing practices offer a viable strategy for increasing the diversity and abundance of obligate grassland and ecotonal breeding birds within existing cattle‐grazed landscapes in the Southeastern United States.