Uncertainty Quantification of Fibrotic Conductivity Effects on Computational Model-Derived Ablation of Atypical Left Atrial Flutter

Cardiac computational models are powerful tools to improve treatment of complex cardiac arrhythmias. However, such computational models rely on many uncertain inputs, and the effects of this input uncertainty on the model-derived treatment strategies are unclear. We have developed a computational model-guided ablation planning tool to aid in the ablation of reentrant circuits found in atypical left atrial flutter (ALAF). We then applied parametric uncertainty quantification to assess the effect of errors and variability in the conductivity of fibrotic tissue on the model outputs and suggested ablation patterns. In a computational model of a patient who presented with ALAF, we found that our model-guided ablation tool reduced the number of simulated ALAF circuits from 10 preablation to 4 postablation. Uncertainty quantification revealed that fibrotic conductivity affected the suggested ablation sites substantially; however, the uncertainty quantification also provided a method to display a proposed ablation strategy in a manner that accounts for the input parameter uncertainty. The results of this study show the twofold insight of UQ. This method provides a robust means to explore the effects of input parameter variability on predictions of reentrant arrhythmia. We suggest it can also present modeling results that display the uncertainty associated with model predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computing in cardiology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2024.021
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty Quantification of Fibrotic Conductivity Effects on Computational Model-Derived Ablation of Atypical Left Atrial Flutter

Kyoichiro Yazaki, Eugene E. Kwan, Bram Hunt, Akil Narayan et al.
Computing in cardiology
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Uncertainty Quantification of Fibrotic Conductivity Effects on Computational Model-Derived Ablation of Atypical Left Atrial Flutter

Kyoichiro Yazaki, Eugene E. Kwan, Bram Hunt, Akil Narayan, Ravi Ranjan, Brian Zenger, Rob MacLeod, Eric Paccione, Jake Bergquist, Ben A. Orkild
article en

Abstract

Cardiac computational models are powerful tools to improve treatment of complex cardiac arrhythmias. However, such computational models rely on many uncertain inputs, and the effects of this input uncertainty on the model-derived treatment strategies are unclear. We have developed a computational model-guided ablation planning tool to aid in the ablation of reentrant circuits found in atypical left atrial flutter (ALAF). We then applied parametric uncertainty quantification to assess the effect of errors and variability in the conductivity of fibrotic tissue on the model outputs and suggested ablation patterns. In a computational model of a patient who presented with ALAF, we found that our model-guided ablation tool reduced the number of simulated ALAF circuits from 10 preablation to 4 postablation. Uncertainty quantification revealed that fibrotic conductivity affected the suggested ablation sites substantially; however, the uncertainty quantification also provided a method to display a proposed ablation strategy in a manner that accounts for the input parameter uncertainty. The results of this study show the twofold insight of UQ. This method provides a robust means to explore the effects of input parameter variability on predictions of reentrant arrhythmia. We suggest it can also present modeling results that display the uncertainty associated with model predictions.

Computing in cardiologyVol. 51
Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Utah (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, University of Utah, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Science Research and Development, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.