Comparative Study on the Generalization Ability of Machine Learning Algorithms for PPG Quality Assessment

Photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals are often too noisy to accurately measure heart rate.Methods for PPG quality assessment based on machine learning (ML) concepts have gained considerable attention, but they have been commonly developed on datasets recorded under specific conditions and not tested on others.Hence, the aim of the present work is to compare their performance and generalization ability on datasets representative of different conditions.Three common classifiers, such as decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), were trained on a publicly available dataset and tested on two external datasets, also freely available.The obtained results reported a different generalization ability for each classifier.Whereas DT was unable to generalize for any external dataset, SVM and KNN were only able for an external dataset presenting PPG signals acquired with the same recording system and then with a morphology similar to those in the training one.Hence, the selection of datasets for training and validation seems a key aspect to be taken into account to know where a machine learning method can be reliably used for PPG quality assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computing in cardiology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2024.279
Primary Topic
Advanced Computing and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on the Generalization Ability of Machine Learning Algorithms for PPG Quality Assessment

Roberto Zangróniz, J.J. Rieta, Óscar Ayo‐Martín, Raúl Alcaraz et al.
Computing in cardiology
Advanced Computing and Algorithms
article

Comparative Study on the Generalization Ability of Machine Learning Algorithms for PPG Quality Assessment

Roberto Zangróniz, J.J. Rieta, Óscar Ayo‐Martín, Raúl Alcaraz, Santiago Mula
article en

Abstract

Photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals are often too noisy to accurately measure heart rate.Methods for PPG quality assessment based on machine learning (ML) concepts have gained considerable attention, but they have been commonly developed on datasets recorded under specific conditions and not tested on others.Hence, the aim of the present work is to compare their performance and generalization ability on datasets representative of different conditions.Three common classifiers, such as decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), were trained on a publicly available dataset and tested on two external datasets, also freely available.The obtained results reported a different generalization ability for each classifier.Whereas DT was unable to generalize for any external dataset, SVM and KNN were only able for an external dataset presenting PPG signals acquired with the same recording system and then with a morphology similar to those in the training one.Hence, the selection of datasets for training and validation seems a key aspect to be taken into account to know where a machine learning method can be reliably used for PPG quality assessment.

Computing in cardiologyVol. 51
Generalitat Valenciana, Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, European Regional Development Fund, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Advanced Computing and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Study on the Generalization Ability of Machine Learning Algorithms for PPG Quality Assessment — Roberto Zangróniz, J.J. Rieta, et al. · Computing in cardiology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS