Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasts over the Pearl River Estuary: Numerical Model Evaluation and Deterministic Post-Processing

<p indent="0mm">The Pearl River Estuary (PRE) is one of China’s busiest shipping hubs and fishery production centers, as well as a region with abundant island tourism and wind energy resources, which calls for accurate short-term wind forecasts. First, this study evaluated three operational numerical models, i.e., ECMWF-EC, NCEP-GFS, and CMA-GD, for their ability to predict short-term wind speed over the PRE against in-situ observations during 2018–2021. Overall, ECMWF-EC outperforms other models with an average RMSE of <sc>2.24 m s<sup>–1</sup> </sc> and <italic>R</italic> of 0.57, but the NCEP-GFS performs better in the case of strong winds. Then, various bias correction and multi-model ensemble (MME) methods are used to perform the deterministic post-processing using a local and lead-specific scheme. Two-factor model output statistics (MOS2) is the optimal bias correction method for reducing (increasing) the overall RMSE (<italic>R</italic>) to <sc>1.62 (0.70) m s<sup>–1</sup> </sc>, demonstrating the benefits of considering both initial and lead-specific information. Intercomparison of MME results reveals that Multiple linear regression (MLR) presents superior skills, followed by random forest (RF), but it is slightly inferior to MOS2, particularly for the first few forecasting hours. Furthermore, the incorporation of additional features in MLR reduces the overall RMSE to <sc>1.53 m s<sup>–1</sup> </sc> and increases <italic>R</italic> to 0.74. Similarly, RF presents comparable results, and both outperform MOS2 in terms of correcting their deficiencies at the first few lead hours and limiting the error growth rate. Despite the satisfactory skill of deterministic post-processing techniques, they are unable to achieve a balanced performance between mean and extreme statistics. This highlights the necessity for further development of probabilistic forecasts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tropical Meteorology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3724/j.1006-8775.2024.035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasts over the Pearl River Estuary: Numerical Model Evaluation and Deterministic Post-Processing

Dong Xia, Yekang Su, Hui Kang, Wei Huang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Tropical Meteorology
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
0.38
article

Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasts over the Pearl River Estuary: Numerical Model Evaluation and Deterministic Post-Processing

Dong Xia, Yekang Su, Hui Kang, Wei Huang, Lei Sun, Xiuji Liang, Xian Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<p indent="0mm">The Pearl River Estuary (PRE) is one of China’s busiest shipping hubs and fishery production centers, as well as a region with abundant island tourism and wind energy resources, which calls for accurate short-term wind forecasts. First, this study evaluated three operational numerical models, i.e., ECMWF-EC, NCEP-GFS, and CMA-GD, for their ability to predict short-term wind speed over the PRE against in-situ observations during 2018–2021. Overall, ECMWF-EC outperforms other models with an average RMSE of <sc>2.24 m s<sup>–1</sup> </sc> and <italic>R</italic> of 0.57, but the NCEP-GFS performs better in the case of strong winds. Then, various bias correction and multi-model ensemble (MME) methods are used to perform the deterministic post-processing using a local and lead-specific scheme. Two-factor model output statistics (MOS2) is the optimal bias correction method for reducing (increasing) the overall RMSE (<italic>R</italic>) to <sc>1.62 (0.70) m s<sup>–1</sup> </sc>, demonstrating the benefits of considering both initial and lead-specific information. Intercomparison of MME results reveals that Multiple linear regression (MLR) presents superior skills, followed by random forest (RF), but it is slightly inferior to MOS2, particularly for the first few forecasting hours. Furthermore, the incorporation of additional features in MLR reduces the overall RMSE to <sc>1.53 m s<sup>–1</sup> </sc> and increases <italic>R</italic> to 0.74. Similarly, RF presents comparable results, and both outperform MOS2 in terms of correcting their deficiencies at the first few lead hours and limiting the error growth rate. Despite the satisfactory skill of deterministic post-processing techniques, they are unable to achieve a balanced performance between mean and extreme statistics. This highlights the necessity for further development of probabilistic forecasts.

Journal of Tropical MeteorologyVol. 30(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
0.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.