Evaluation of the physical and economic potential of surfactant-based CO2 capture and storage in a saline aquifer

Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) storage in saline aquifers is considered essential to reduce CO 2 emissions. However, the pressure buildup associated with CO 2 injection [conventional CO 2 capture and storage (CCS)] into such reservoirs constrains dynamic storage. Studies have shown the benefits of surfactants in CCS, alleviating the pressure buildup and improving CO 2 injectivity. However, these studies examined only the surfactant benefits without considering the associated costs, which compromise the adaptability of surfactant use beyond the experimental scale. Thus, an estimate of the potential costs of surfactant-based CCS is needed to facilitate surfactant use on a field scale. This study evaluated the economics of surfactant-based CCS in a saline aquifer. We used the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST–CO 2 lab) to forecast the long-term behavior of the injected CO 2 and examine the optimal injection rate that can be achieved with and without surfactant. We constructed an economic model that encompasses the CO 2 capture, transport, and storage costs calculated using Indonesian, European, and U.S. standards and applied it to the Johansen formation in the Norwegian Sea. We used U.S. and European CO 2 emission tax credit policies to assess the net present value (NPV) of the CCS project with and without surfactant injection, which is a more realistic way to evaluate surfactant-based CCS development compared with other studies. The results show that CCS is more sensitive to the reservoir storage capacity and CO 2 emission tax credit, such that a small storage reservoir entails a higher cost and requires a higher CO 2 emission tax credit to offset the capital investment. The use of surfactants alleviates the higher CCS cost by increasing the injection rate, and CCS facility sharing can reduce the cost of CO 2 transport to the injection site. Therefore, further analysis is needed to quantify both conventional and surfactant-based CCS at a regional level.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.12.018
Citations
3
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the physical and economic potential of surfactant-based CO2 capture and storage in a saline aquifer

Joseph Iranzi, Digne Edmond Rwabuhungu Rwatangabo, Hanam Son
3 citations
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
0.62
article

Evaluation of the physical and economic potential of surfactant-based CO2 capture and storage in a saline aquifer

Joseph Iranzi, Digne Edmond Rwabuhungu Rwatangabo, Hanam Son
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) storage in saline aquifers is considered essential to reduce CO 2 emissions. However, the pressure buildup associated with CO 2 injection [conventional CO 2 capture and storage (CCS)] into such reservoirs constrains dynamic storage. Studies have shown the benefits of surfactants in CCS, alleviating the pressure buildup and improving CO 2 injectivity. However, these studies examined only the surfactant benefits without considering the associated costs, which compromise the adaptability of surfactant use beyond the experimental scale. Thus, an estimate of the potential costs of surfactant-based CCS is needed to facilitate surfactant use on a field scale. This study evaluated the economics of surfactant-based CCS in a saline aquifer. We used the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST–CO 2 lab) to forecast the long-term behavior of the injected CO 2 and examine the optimal injection rate that can be achieved with and without surfactant. We constructed an economic model that encompasses the CO 2 capture, transport, and storage costs calculated using Indonesian, European, and U.S. standards and applied it to the Johansen formation in the Norwegian Sea. We used U.S. and European CO 2 emission tax credit policies to assess the net present value (NPV) of the CCS project with and without surfactant injection, which is a more realistic way to evaluate surfactant-based CCS development compared with other studies. The results show that CCS is more sensitive to the reservoir storage capacity and CO 2 emission tax credit, such that a small storage reservoir entails a higher cost and requires a higher CO 2 emission tax credit to offset the capital investment. The use of surfactants alleviates the higher CCS cost by increasing the injection rate, and CCS facility sharing can reduce the cost of CO 2 transport to the injection site. Therefore, further analysis is needed to quantify both conventional and surfactant-based CCS at a regional level.

Journal of Industrial and Engineering ChemistryVol. 147
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
0.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the physical and economic potential of surfactant-based CO2 capture and storage in a saline aquifer — Joseph Iranzi, Digne Edmond Rwabuhungu Rwatangabo, et al. · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS