Does Proprioceptive Impairment Affect Feedforward Motor Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on Patients With Brain Damage

Sensory ataxia and cerebellar ataxia share common manifestations including dysmetria, intentional tremor and lack of smoothness. We formulated a theoretical framework to describe the patients' sensory and cerebellar ataxic behavior as consequences of a forward model impairment. To test this framework, the present study aimed to compare upper limb movement kinematics in an index-to-nose task between three groups: healthy controls, people with CNS focal lesions and cerebellar deficits and people with CNS focal lesions and somatosensory impairment. We recruited 12 healthy controls (age years, female = 5) and 20 participants with focal CNS lesions. We divided the sample according to the lesion site in participants with lesions in areas involved in the somatosensory information processing (n = 12, age years, female = 5) and participants with lesions in the cerebellum or cerebellar peduncle (n = 8, age years, female = 1). Movement features concerning movement efficiency (average velocity, peak velocity), accuracy (spatial error when pointing to the nose) and motor planning (timing and spatial occurrence of velocity peak, velocity and deviation from ideal trajectory at 150ms after the movement onset) were computed. Both the groups of participants with CNS lesions performed the movement slower than healthy controls. When comparing results from the two groups of patients, we showed that participants with cerebellar lesions were characterized by greater trial-to-trial variability of the velocity peak (repeated measure ANOVA group effect: F = 5.242, p = 0.012) and its timing (condition*group interaction: F = 5.38, p = 0.011). Our findings suggested that both participants with cerebellar and somatosensory deficits showed signs of anticipatory motor control impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2024.3518416
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Proprioceptive Impairment Affect Feedforward Motor Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on Patients With Brain Damage

Michele Boldo, Nicola Smania, Nicola Valè, Enrico Martini et al.
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Motor Control and Adaptation
0.69
article

Does Proprioceptive Impairment Affect Feedforward Motor Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on Patients With Brain Damage

Michele Boldo, Nicola Smania, Nicola Valè, Enrico Martini, Anna Righetti, Nicola Bombieri
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Sensory ataxia and cerebellar ataxia share common manifestations including dysmetria, intentional tremor and lack of smoothness. We formulated a theoretical framework to describe the patients' sensory and cerebellar ataxic behavior as consequences of a forward model impairment. To test this framework, the present study aimed to compare upper limb movement kinematics in an index-to-nose task between three groups: healthy controls, people with CNS focal lesions and cerebellar deficits and people with CNS focal lesions and somatosensory impairment. We recruited 12 healthy controls (age years, female = 5) and 20 participants with focal CNS lesions. We divided the sample according to the lesion site in participants with lesions in areas involved in the somatosensory information processing (n = 12, age years, female = 5) and participants with lesions in the cerebellum or cerebellar peduncle (n = 8, age years, female = 1). Movement features concerning movement efficiency (average velocity, peak velocity), accuracy (spatial error when pointing to the nose) and motor planning (timing and spatial occurrence of velocity peak, velocity and deviation from ideal trajectory at 150ms after the movement onset) were computed. Both the groups of participants with CNS lesions performed the movement slower than healthy controls. When comparing results from the two groups of patients, we showed that participants with cerebellar lesions were characterized by greater trial-to-trial variability of the velocity peak (repeated measure ANOVA group effect: F = 5.242, p = 0.012) and its timing (condition*group interaction: F = 5.38, p = 0.011). Our findings suggested that both participants with cerebellar and somatosensory deficits showed signs of anticipatory motor control impairment.

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringVol. 33
University of Verona (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Motor Control and Adaptation
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.